If you buy individual stocks - why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stocks
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the motivations behind buying individual stocks versus investing in index funds. Participants explore the implications of stock picking as a potential zero-sum game, the influence of cognitive biases, and the role of personal knowledge and experience in making investment decisions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that cognitive biases, particularly overconfidence, may drive individuals to buy individual stocks, while others see entertainment value as a factor.
  • One participant argues that stock picking is not necessarily a zero-sum game, noting that index funds focus on large-cap companies and may not represent the entire market.
  • Another participant points out the existence of index funds that cover the entire market, including smaller companies, challenging the notion that individual stock picking is always against index funds.
  • A participant shares a personal experience of successfully picking a stock based on prior knowledge, suggesting that informed decisions can lead to positive outcomes, but acknowledges that such instances are rare.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of personal knowledge and experience in stock selection, suggesting that insights gained from interactions with companies can inform better investment choices.
  • One comment briefly mentions the potential profitability of insider trading, implying ethical concerns without further elaboration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether stock picking is a zero-sum game and the effectiveness of individual stock selection compared to index funds. There is no consensus on the motivations for buying individual stocks, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various investment strategies and personal experiences, but the discussion does not resolve the complexities of market dynamics or the validity of the zero-sum game concept in this context.

BWV
Messages
1,670
Reaction score
2,017
Given that stockpicking is a zero sum game relative to index returns (before transaction costs - after costs it is negative sum), is it simply the cognitive bias of overconfidence the reason why you all buy individual stocks? Or is it for the entertainment value

Probably a mixture of both for me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not necessarily a zero sum game.
Index funds only buy the index listed shares (FTSE 100 etc) not the whole market - this biases them toward the companies and industries with the largest market cap.
If you are interested in industries where companies are smaller then you are not necessarily playing against the index funds.
 
mgb_phys said:
It's not necessarily a zero sum game.
Index funds only buy the index listed shares (FTSE 100 etc) not the whole market - this biases them toward the companies and industries with the largest market cap.
If you are interested in industries where companies are smaller then you are not necessarily playing against the index funds.

There are plenty of index funds that buy the entire market (Vanguard Total Stock Market for one). It is true that indexes are biased toward larger companies, but there are index funds that buy every stock in the bottom decile of market capitalization of the US market. So if you want to buy small stocks you can buy this or the Russell 2000 or any number of smaller cap products.
 
I would only pick individual stocks that I had some knowledge of. I used to be very up on computer technology and knew that AMD would win the 1ghz race before the markets recognized it. It was a big winner for me and I even got my parents to thow a bunch of their money at it (much more than I did, in fact).

But that was a pretty rare and special circumstance. Generally, individual stock picks are a toss-up. "Zero sum game" is a bad term to throw around in economics, but it is true that 100 relatively knowledgeable people picking stocks cannot generally do better than 100 monkeys picking stocks.

The Wall Street Journal once did an experiment where their editors threw darts - literally - at their stock page, then tracked their hypothetical mutual fund for a while. It did quite well.
 
russ_watters said:
I would only pick individual stocks that I had some knowledge of...
I second that approach. Observation of companies I've had opportunity to deal with over time via visits from their sales staff, interaction with their engineers and middle management - whether they bumble along, are unresponsive, unmotivated, or the opposite - that all tells a story that often doesn't show up for the analysts until much later.
 
Insider trading is rather lucrative...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K