Ignoring SSB in massless phi^4 theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter geoduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Massless Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of using the field \(\phi\) versus the new field \(\rho\) in perturbation theory for massless \(\phi^4\) theory, particularly in the context of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB). It is established that while calculations can be performed using \(\phi\), employing \(\rho\) is more accurate and efficient. This approach allows for precise determination of the ground-state energy and the mass of particles resulting from spontaneous breaking, especially at the 1-loop level.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB)
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of massless \(\phi^4\) theory
  • Concept of ground-state expectation values in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of ground-state energy in spontaneously broken theories
  • Learn about the implications of 1-loop corrections in quantum field theories
  • Investigate the role of effective potential in massless \(\phi^4\) theory
  • Explore advanced perturbation techniques in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of spontaneous symmetry breaking and perturbation methods.

geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
If a theory is spontaneously broken, you usually make calculations by expanding the field about the ground-state expectation value [itex]\nu[/itex], so that you define a new field [itex]\rho[/itex] such that [itex]\phi=\nu+\rho[/itex] such that [itex]\langle \rho \rangle =0[/itex].

What if you just calculate perturbation theory with [itex]\phi[/itex] instead of the new field [itex]\rho[/itex]?

It seems that massless [itex]\phi^4[/itex] is spontaneously broken at the 1-loop level. So do you have to do perturbation theory with the field [itex]\rho[/itex] instead of [itex]\phi[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible to do perturbation theory with the field \phi, however it is not necessarily the most accurate or efficient way to approach the problem. Expanding the field about the ground-state expectation value \nu by defining a new field \rho allows you to find the exact ground-state energy of the system as well as calculate the mass of the particle created due to the spontaneous breaking. This method is often thought of as the more effective way to approach the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K