I'm forgetting my geometry. Can I solve this triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dzidziaud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Triangle
dzidziaud
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I'm doing a physics problem, and I think I'd get the right answer if I solved this triangle. I don't know any angles. The base is 56 meters long, its height is 500 meters, and the difference between the other two sides is 4 meters. Can I figure out the sides based on this information?
If not, can I at least find out the difference in position of the vertex between the two unknown sides if they were equal vs in this situation? I hope that makes sense.
 
on Phys.org
dzidziaud said:

Homework Statement


So I'm doing a physics problem, and I think I'd get the right answer if I solved this triangle. I don't know any angles. The base is 56 meters long, its height is 500 meters, and the difference between the other two sides is 4 meters. Can I figure out the sides based on this information?
If not, can I at least find out the difference in position of the vertex between the two unknown sides if they were equal vs in this situation? I hope that makes sense.
Yes. You have enough information to figure out the sides. Think Pythagorean Theorem.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Yes. You have enough information to figure out the sides. Think Pythagorean Theorem.

Chet

I am assuming you mean by dropping a perpendicular that is the height of the triangle, so it is split into two right triangles? I can't figure out what to do from there though because I don't know how the 52 m side is split.
 
dzidziaud said:
I am assuming you mean by dropping a perpendicular that is the height of the triangle, so it is split into two right triangles? I can't figure out what to do from there though because I don't know how the 52 m side is split.
Split it into y and 56-y, and then get two equations in two unknowns. Of course, the other two sides are x and x+4.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks, I finally figured it out! Unfortunately, I got the wrong answer, so I'm approaching the actual physics problem wrong. At least I got some good geometry practice out of it :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K