I'm pretty sure these molecules are polar

  • Thread starter Thread starter aclark609
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules Polar
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
aclark609
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Are there not dipole-dipole interactions between CHBr3, CH3Br, CH3Cl, and CHCl3? Assume they are all separate pure substances. My professor today said that the only intermolecular forces present were dispersion forces. Are the dipole attractions negligible due to fact they are too weak?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
All these molecules are polar. It's hard for me to see how dipole-dipole interactions would be negligible compared to dispersion forces.
 
That's what I thought. I'll approach her with this next class period. I don't see how someone with a doctorate could miss something so obvious. There must be more to it.
 
for example chloromethane is non-polar because it's a symmetrical molecule and its dipole moments cancel each other out...
 
janhaa said:
for example chloromethane is non-polar because it's a symmetrical molecule and its dipole moments cancel each other out...
It has a C3 symmetry axis along the C-Cl bond, but that bond is highly polar. CH3Cl had a dipole moment of 1.9 D.
 
aclark609 said:
I don't see how someone with a doctorate could miss something so obvious.

I've heard PhDs say pretty stupid things!

Depending on her particular field, this might be a subject she is less comfortable with.