Impact Parameter, Closest Approach

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance of closest approach for a 15 MeV alpha particle colliding with a magnesium nucleus, focusing on concepts related to impact parameters and potential energy in nuclear interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different formulas for the distance of closest approach, questioning the relevance of impact parameter and potential energy equations. There is confusion about the appropriate formula to use and the implications of the calculated distances in relation to nuclear and atomic radii.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the formulas and their applicability, but there remains uncertainty about the calculations and assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies between calculated distances and expected nuclear radii, raising questions about the role of Coulomb repulsion and the nature of the interactions at play. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem and the need for careful consideration of the physics involved.

genloz
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


3. A 15MeV Alpha particle is incident at impact paramter b=0 on a Mg Nucleus, atomic number Z=12 and atomic mass A=24. What is the distance of closest approach?


Homework Equations


None given, but I thought the following might be relevant:
[tex]r_{min}=\frac{Zke^{2}}{KE}[/tex]
[tex]b=\frac{Zke^{2}}{KE} * \sqrt{\frac{1+cos\theta}{1-cos\theta}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


First I thought that given the above:
[tex]b=r * \sqrt{\frac{1+cos\theta}{1-cos\theta}}[/tex]
[tex]0=r * \sqrt{\frac{1+cos\theta}{1-cos\theta}}[/tex]
[tex]r=0[/tex]

But then I thought perhaps the distance of closest approach is just the radius of the nucleus:
[tex]r=r_{0}A^{1/3}[/tex]

Now I'm confused about which is appropriate!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The impact parameter is 0. It's heading straight for the nucleus. At closest approach when it's velocity is zero, the potential energy equals the initial kinetic energy. It's not that complicated.
 
Okay.. that's helpful, thanks...

So you're saying 15Mev = (3/2) 1.44 Z1Z/r MeV fm
15Mev = (3/2) 1.44 Z1Z/r MeV fm
r=18*Z1Z/125
r=18*12*2/125=3.456fm
?
 
Yes, something like that. Where is the 3/2 coming from?
 
Last edited:
That's the energy a particle needs to pass through a charged sphere of radius R. It's not a distance of closest approach. I think you should use the previous formula which treats the particles as points.
 
Okay, thanks... So
U = 1.44 (Z1Z/r) MeV fm
15Mev = 1.44 Z1Z/r MeV fm
r=1.44*Z1Z/125
r=1.44*12*2/125
r=0.276fm

But this is even smaller than the radius of the nucleus which doesn't really make sense...
 
Now where did the 125 come from? Isn't that supposed to be a 15?
 
Oh, you're right.. sorry, so:
r=2.3fm...

That's still smaller than r=r0A^(1/3)=1.3*12^(1/3)=2.9762 (radius of the atom)... so that means it's closer than the electrons to the nucleus?
Also what happened to coulomb repulsion?
 
  • #10
You just computed the radius of the nucleus, not of the atom. The atom is MUCH bigger. I guess that's telling you that a 15MeV alpha has enough kinetic energy to overcome the repulsion to the degree it can interact with the nucleus. The electrons don't have much to do with it, almost all of the serious repulsion takes place inside of the electron clouds.
 
  • #11
Ok, thanks very much... so the formula U = 1.44 (Z1Z/r) MeV fm already takes the coulomb force into consideration?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K