Implications of the no-clone theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter carllacan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The no-cloning theorem asserts that a cloning operator U can only successfully copy orthogonal quantum states, such as ##|\psi \rangle## and ##|\phi \rangle##, but fails for non-orthogonal states. If a device is constructed to clone these orthogonal states, it cannot produce a valid clone from a linear combination of them, resulting in an entangled state instead of two identical copies. Additionally, distinguishing non-orthogonal states implies the ability to clone them, highlighting the intrinsic link between state distinguishability and cloning capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum states and superposition
  • Familiarity with the concepts of orthogonality in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of quantum cloning and entanglement
  • Basic comprehension of quantum measurement principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the no-cloning theorem in quantum information theory
  • Explore the concept of quantum entanglement and its relation to cloning
  • Learn about quantum state distinguishability and measurement techniques
  • Investigate Nielsen and Chuang's "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, quantum information theorists, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to understand the limitations of quantum cloning and the nature of quantum states.

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Hi.

I'm struggling to understand the no-cloning theorem and its consequences. It says that if we construct a cloning operator U it will be able to just copy orthogonal states, but I don't fully grasp what is meant by that, both abstractly and practically. My questions:

1) Does it mean that if we construct a device that implements said operator it will only be successful when the input state is one of a given set of states (different for every such device, and dependent on its mechanism) that are orthogonal to one another? What would happen if we used the device with another state, say one that is a linear combination of two of such states?

2) Tthere's an exercise on Nielsen's book that asks me to show that a device that could distinguish between non-orthogonal states (that is, it can tell if a system is in the state ##|\psi \rangle ## or the state ##|\phi \rangle## even when ## \langle\psi | \phi \rangle ≠ 0##) then it could clone general states, and viceversa. The only solution I've come up with is:

If we had a way of distinguishing non-orthogonal states we could use it to find out what state a system is in and then prepare another qubit in the same state, thus cloning it. Conversely, if we had a general cloning device we could clone a qubit a large number of times and then perform measurements on all its copies to find what state is in. Both these answers seem kind of "inelegant" to me, and I'm not even sure there are correct. Is there any cleaner solution to this problem?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes.
As for what happens for non-orthogonal states, suppose ##|\psi \rangle, |\phi \rangle## are orthogonal states that can be cloned to a "blank" state ##|0\rangle## with a device ##U##. Then
$$ U(|\psi \rangle + |\phi \rangle)|0\rangle = |\psi\rangle |\psi \rangle + |\phi \rangle |\phi \rangle $$
which is an entangled state hence can't be the product state of two copies of ##|\psi \rangle + |\phi \rangle## that we want. This generalizes to an arbitrary linear combination of the orthogonal states.

2) That's right.

I don't see what is bad about the argument. It doesn't require any calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: carllacan
Truecrimson said:
1) Yes.
As for what happens for non-orthogonal states, suppose ##|\psi \rangle, |\phi \rangle## are orthogonal states that can be cloned to a "blank" state ##|0\rangle## with a device ##U##. Then
$$ U(|\psi \rangle + |\phi \rangle)|0\rangle = |\psi\rangle |\psi \rangle + |\phi \rangle |\phi \rangle $$
which is an entangled state hence can't be the product state of two copies of ##|\psi \rangle + |\phi \rangle## that we want. This generalizes to an arbitrary linear combination of the orthogonal states.

Great, thank you for your answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K