A Is there an additional assumption in the PBR theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeterDonis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the PBR theorem and the potential oversight of an additional assumption regarding the ontic state during measurement. It suggests that the assumption that the ontic state remains unchanged during the measurement process is crucial for the theorem's validity. The reasoning presented indicates that if the ontic state can change, it undermines the theorem's conclusions, as the post-measurement state may not align with the pre-measurement probability distributions. The conversation also touches on the distinction between ontic and epistemic interpretations of quantum states, emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding these concepts. Overall, the thread raises important questions about the implications of measurement on ontic states in quantum mechanics.
  • #121
zonde said:
I don't know if there is some general rule about possibility to implement some measurement.

Any set of orthogonal vectors that span a Hilbert space must be eigenvectors of some Hermitian operator on that Hilbert space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K