Impulse Engine (Drive) ....a stupid question?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of centripetal force in a hypothetical scenario involving a person swinging a rock in space. The user contemplates whether releasing the rock while attached to a rope would allow them to move in the opposite direction, leveraging Newton's second law. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that while energy is expended to create centripetal force, the net effect results in no permanent change in position or velocity in the user's rest frame. This reflects a misunderstanding of energy transfer in such a system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of centripetal force
  • Familiarity with concepts of motion in a vacuum
  • Introductory quantum mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of centripetal force in non-inertial reference frames
  • Explore the principles of energy conservation in classical mechanics
  • Study the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics, particularly electron movement
  • Investigate the effects of magnetic fields on charged particles
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of motion and energy transfer in both classical and quantum mechanics.

infinitrode
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Recently, I've been watching a lot of those youtube videos debunking gyroscopic propulsion because everything about it violates the second law of motion or something...

This got me thinking, if I was floating in space and I decided to swing a large rock on a rope around me, to generate some centripetal force on the rock, then let go of the rope (it's a really long rope and I'm attached to the slack), I'm assuming it would just float away from me given the centripetal force. Now, since I'm attached to the rope, and given Newton's second law, I would be able to pull my self a significant distance given the mass and velocity of the rock. Correct?

Assuming this is correct, would something similar to this effect be possible on the quantum level with electrons and magnetic fields or something?
 
Science news on Phys.org
You move some distance, to rock moves in the opposite direction. At some point the rope does not allow more motion, you and the rock are stopped (in the frame of your original position) and you end up with exactly the same speed as before. Yes you moved a bit, but the rock did that as well, if you pull it back you end up in the same position as you started.

infinitrode said:
Assuming this is correct, would something similar to this effect be possible on the quantum level with electrons and magnetic fields or something?
You can move around everything with energy, but I don't see the point. You cannot change your velocity, and you cannot even permanently change your position (in your rest frame) by a relevant amount.
 
mfb said:
You move some distance, to rock moves in the opposite direction. At some point the rope does not allow more motion, you and the rock are stopped (in the frame of your original position) and you end up with exactly the same speed as before. Yes you moved a bit, but the rock did that as well, if you pull it back you end up in the same position as you started.

You can move around everything with energy, but I don't see the point. You cannot change your velocity, and you cannot even permanently change your position (in your rest frame) by a relevant amount.
Dang it, you're right. My first thought was that the amount of energy expended in generating a large centripetal force should transfer to distance gained when I pull on the rope after I let it go, but instead, after you let it go, you traveled in the opposite direction at a proportional speed. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
986
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
994
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K