Lingusitics "In a couple of weeks' time"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    meaning Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nuanced differences between the phrases "in a couple of weeks" and "in a couple of weeks' time." "In a couple of weeks' time" is often preferred for specificity, particularly when distinguishing temporal measurements from spatial ones. The repetition of temporal terms can emphasize the future, which is significant in modern English due to its lack of a specific future tense. Examples illustrate that both phrases can convey similar meanings, but the latter may add clarity in certain contexts. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the desired level of specificity in communication.
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
763
Comparing "in a couple of weeks" and "in a couple of weeks' time", are there situations where one or the other would be slightly more suitable by way of more nuanced meaning?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Swamp Thing said:
Comparing "in a couple of weeks" and "in a couple of weeks' time", are there situations where one or the other would be slightly more suitable by way of more nuanced meaning?
Sure. You would use "a couple of weeks time" when you wanted to distinguish it from "a couple of weeks length", or "a couple of weeks height". :oldlaugh: :smile: :oldlaugh:

Sorry. I couldn't help myself, having long been astounded at the inanity of saying "at this point in time" as opposed to "at this time" or, even better, just "now" and saying "in a <period>'s time" instead of " in a <period>", whether period is minutes, hours, days, weeks, decades, or whatever.

We got this from the British, who, apparently, have difficulty distinguishing between temporal measurements and spatial measurements and need to be specific in order to not confuse their audiences.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes symbolipoint, Bystander and Swamp Thing
Swamp Thing said:
Comparing "in a couple of weeks" and "in a couple of weeks' time", are there situations where one or the other would be slightly more suitable by way of more nuanced meaning?
Yes, when the author seeks specificity over brevity. Also, repeating temporal terms -- weeks and time -- emphasizes future as modern English lacks a specific future tense.

"The lake will evaporate in a few weeks."

"The water in the lake will evaporate in a few weeks' time."
 
  • Wow
  • Skeptical
Likes symbolipoint and phinds
Swamp Thing said:
"in a couple of weeks' time"
Fixed that for you. I've never seen "of" in that type of phrase. Like this:
Klystron said:
"The water in the lake will evaporate in a few weeks' time."
 
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.

Similar threads

Back
Top