In NYC, front doors are for rich people only

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "poor doors" in New York City, where separate entrances are designated for low-income residents in luxury residential buildings. Participants explore the implications of this practice on social equity, community dynamics, and the perception of class divisions within urban living environments.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express outrage over the existence of "poor doors," viewing them as a symbol of social inequality and second-class citizenship for low-income residents.
  • Others argue that individuals have the choice not to live in such buildings, suggesting that the arrangement is a trade-off for living in desirable neighborhoods.
  • A participant questions the accuracy of the reporting from Yahoo News, suggesting it may not reflect a widespread issue.
  • Concerns are raised about the enforcement of income restrictions for access to entrances, with some questioning how such rules could be practically implemented.
  • Some participants note that the separation of entrances may be legally justified if affordable units are considered distinct from luxury units.
  • There is a discussion about the motivations of wealthy tenants seeking exclusivity and how this influences building management decisions.
  • A participant reflects on personal experiences with income and living conditions, highlighting the challenges faced by those earning below a certain threshold.
  • Speculation arises regarding the physical layout of the buildings and whether the term "back door" accurately describes the situation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of "poor doors," with multiple competing views remaining on the morality, legality, and social impact of such practices.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and conditions surrounding income restrictions and the physical layout of the buildings, indicating that further clarification is needed.

  • #31
I've got a different thought:

The status grants Extell the aforementioned tax breaks and the right to construct a larger building than would ordinarily be allowed.

So first gov limits the supply and later fights heroically with too high prices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Czcibor said:
I've got a different thought:



So first gov limits the supply and later fights heroically with too high prices?

The height of newly constructed buildings is strictly controlled in NYC, especially in the high demand areas. People who pay top dollar want height, but If you want to build a high rise with only residential units, you're going to have a tough time. But if you include in your building permit application a few floors of commercial space, you can get away with extra floors. Problem is: if you are paying 12 million for a penthouse condo, do you really want tons of people coming into your building visiting Wells Fargo or tons of foot traffic from clients visiting the financial group that moved into the 4th floor? Probably not. So adding commercial space to get those penthouses up in the air may not pay off.

However, if you get that extra height because you added subsidized housing, AND that housing is basically completely separated from the luxury condos, you've got the best of both worlds. Good business plan on pretty much all fronts.
 
  • #33
Travis_King said:
The height of newly constructed buildings is strictly controlled in NYC, especially in the high demand areas. People who pay top dollar want height, but If you want to build a high rise with only residential units, you're going to have a tough time. But if you include in your building permit application a few floors of commercial space, you can get away with extra floors. Problem is: if you are paying 12 million for a penthouse condo, do you really want tons of people coming into your building visiting Wells Fargo or tons of foot traffic from clients visiting the financial group that moved into the 4th floor? Probably not. So adding commercial space to get those penthouses up in the air may not pay off.

However, if you get that extra height because you added subsidized housing, AND that housing is basically completely separated from the luxury condos, you've got the best of both worlds. Good business plan on pretty much all fronts.

Can't you also have the best of both worlds by having separate entrances/elevators for businesses and for rentals? Maybe have the low-end condos share the entrance with businesses? If the businesses are facing the street, it is not that big of a deal, since , while high, foot traffic to businesses like delis, supermarkets is not extreme. Besides, I think many appreciate the convenience of having small businesses nearby, so they can just walk out and have a slice of pizza, or an espresso , and are willing to pay the price of having foot traffic around. I have seen this be the case in many fancy/expensive buildings.
 
  • #34
WWGD said:
Can't you also have the best of both worlds by having separate entrances/elevators for businesses and for rentals? Maybe have the low-end condos share the entrance with businesses? If the businesses are facing the street, it is not that big of a deal, since , while high, foot traffic to businesses like delis, supermarkets is not extreme. Besides, I think many appreciate the convenience of having small businesses nearby, so they can just walk out and have a slice of pizza, or an espresso , and are willing to pay the price of having foot traffic around. I have seen this be the case in many fancy/expensive buildings.

The commercial space almost exclusively goes to banks and financial firms (or lawyers, or some sort of thing like that). You almost never see high rises turn into shopping areas. The thing is, unless you are in the financial district, developers don't really build these types of buildings. The turnover is ridiculous; small firms that start up and can't afford madison ave so they go to the upper west side and then fizzle out in a few weeks owing a year and half of rent. So in areas that aren't financial districts, they don't really rent out commercial space, because as nice as it sounds, people who rent condos don't want to live above businesses. There's something psychologically...irksome...about it; people don't like it.

When I say commercial space, what I mean is that they have a first floor lobby, then several floors which are rented to various businesses that do not require foot traffic (so no delis, supermarkets, trinket shops, etc), and then the condos. These are luxury apartments. They have a lobby, a doorman, a lounge area, all that. There are thousands of apartements above delis in the city, but you'll never see luxury apartments above a Vacilios's Greek Market. Nobody will pay 5+ million if their apartment is above a deli.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K