In your experience, is E+M harder than dynamics?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Experience
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparative difficulty of Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) versus Dynamics in college-level calculus-based physics courses. Participants generally agree that while both subjects present similar mathematical challenges, E&M, particularly at the junior/senior level, is perceived as more difficult than classical mechanics. A strong foundation in multivariable vector calculus significantly aids in understanding both subjects, but individual experiences vary based on prior mathematical knowledge and course structure. Notably, Griffiths' E&M is mentioned as a challenging text, while Taylor's Mechanics is considered more accessible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Multivariable vector calculus
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' Electricity and Magnetism
  • Knowledge of Taylor's Classical Mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' Electricity and Magnetism for advanced concepts
  • Review Taylor's Classical Mechanics for foundational understanding
  • Learn about multivariable vector calculus applications in physics
  • Explore differential equations and their relevance in E&M
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying calculus-based courses, educators teaching E&M and Dynamics, and anyone seeking to compare the challenges of these two fundamental physics subjects.

Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91
Just curious on what everyone considers to be the harder calculus-based class in college.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eclair_de_XII said:
Just curious on what everyone considers to be the harder calculus-based class in college.

They're about the same in terms of mathematical difficulty; E&M might have some specialized topics that are more conceptually difficult than those in Dynamics but the opposite can also be true.
 
I found junior / senior level EM and graduate EM much harder than respective courses in classical dynamics. I found Freshman Sophomore EM only slightly more difficult than mechanics.
 
I agree with mpresic. I found dynamics to be far easier than 300 level E+M. Of course, having a strong understanding of multivariable vector calculus before heading into either class can mitigate the difficulty.
 
In the less advanced two courses or the Fundamental courses of Mechanics and of Electricity & Magnetism for the science and engineering students, the calc based ones, ...
Absolutely without any doubt, the E & M course was far more difficult and confusing compared to the fundamental mechanics course.
 
I had an easier time with E&M (Griffiths) than with Mechanics (Taylor)...

...I had not even begun a differential equations course during my Mechanics semester, and was taking multivariable calculus with it, whereas both maths were in my repertoire for E&M. All things being equal? E&M would have probably been a hair more difficult, but based on my circumstance it wasn't close, in the other direction.
 
In my experience classical mechanics were way easier both in freshman and upper-division classes. Upperdivision E&M I was the only course in physics I didn't get an A in :(.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K