Inception [SPOILER ALERT]- What are your theories?

  • Thread starter rmalik
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Theories
In summary: Mal's totem was a representation of him, so I think it would stay the same. Cobb's could be something that he stole (in limbo), or something that was given to him (the ring). I'm still on the fence about where he ended up, and am still searching for answers to come to the conclusion that satisfies me. Knowing Christopher Nolan, he probably has a "correct" answer as he said he has for his movie Memento.If you haven't watched the movie, I recommend you do. The story is difficult to explain for someone who is trying solve the mystery, so I can't do that. Sorry.
  • #1
rmalik
11
1
Anybody watch Inception yet? What are your theories? What is the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


rmalik said:
Anybody watch Inception yet? What are your theories? What is the answer?
For those of us that have no idea what you are talking about, could you please explain the story and what parts of it you would like to discuss?
 
  • #3


I'm putting a spoiler tag in this title. Apparently, this is the best movie of the year, and I've not seen it yet! :grumpy:
 
  • #4


Evo said:
For those of us that have no idea what you are talking about, could you please explain the story and what parts of it you would like to discuss?

Since this is the General Discussion section I am obviously talking about something general. I'm talking about the biggest movie of the year Inception. I just want to hear other people's theories on if Cobb was in the real world, in a dream, or in limbo at the end of the movie. I am still on the fence about where he ended up, and am still searching for answers to come to the conclusion that satisfies me. Knowing Christopher Nolan, he probably has a "correct" answer as he said he has for his movie Memento. If you haven't watched the movie, I recommend you do. The story is difficult to explain for someone who is trying solve the mystery, so I can't do that. Sorry. I would like to discuss the entire movie obviously, as every minute of the movie is crucial to finding the answers.

cristo said:
I'm putting a spoiler tag in this title. Apparently, this is the best movie of the year, and I've not seen it yet! :grumpy:

I should have done that, oops! I remember calling one of my friends last year that Leonardo DiCaprio is making a movie with Christopher Nolan, with a plot based on the mind, dreams, different realities etc. I highly recommend this movie for the Physics forum peeps.
 
  • #5
I will withhold judgement since I have not seen the movie. I did read the plot and all I can say is that I hope the movie makes more sense and isn't as implausible as it sounds in wikipedia. :bugeye:

Edit: I watched the rotten tomatoes show about it and it makes a lot more sense. I want to see it. The person that wrote the wiki review should be shot.

It seems the one negative that everyone agrees on is how bad Leonardo DiCaprio is.

As far as it being plausible, no, it's science fiction, just enjoy the story.

BTW, Memento is one of my favorite movies.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
There's so many theories. There's ones on TV tropes and IMDB.

However I have two theories:

  • Everyone is focused on the top at the end. However I think someone could have possible changed it/stole it. It was also originally Mal's totem.
  • Does Cobb ever really wake up when he goes into the chemist's basement with the people on IVs? It could be that Cobb has really been sleeping all along after encountering the chemist.

An interesting point to make: Mal and Cobb are the only characters with real development. They could be the only real people.

The children are the same age at the end. Some people think this means that Cobb is still in the dream. But it could be that Cobb has been gone for only a very short time, and his children haven't aged.

Anyways I think Nolan is really smart for making the plot so open to interpretation. Many people I think, will go see the movie twice or more (more profit for Nolan).
 
  • #7
Evo said:
I will withhold judgement since I have not seen the movie. I did read the plot and all I can say is that I hope the movie makes more sense and isn't as implausible as it sounds in wikipedia. :bugeye:

Edit: I watched the rotten tomatoes show about it and it makes a lot more sense. I want to see it. The person that wrote the wiki review should be shot.

It seems the one negative that everyone agrees on is how bad Leonardo DiCaprio is.

As far as it being plausible, no, it's science fiction, just enjoy the story.

BTW, Memento is one of my favorite movies.

The movie will definitely make more sense to you once you watch it. Just make sure you pay attention to everything so you can work through it later on. It will be kind of hard without a copy of the movie at your hand. Everybody I talked with and on forums said DiCaprio was excellent, and in my opinion he was phenomenal.

Spreadsheet said:
There's so many theories. There's ones on TV tropes and IMDB.

However I have two theories:

  • Everyone is focused on the top at the end. However I think someone could have possible changed it/stole it. It was also originally Mal's totem.

    I don't think someone changed the top because it cannot be changed. Totems have a unique quality where only the owner knows its unique quality. I just want to point out that when Ariadne reaches for Arthur's totem, he motions her not to and that, "That would defeat the purpose. See only I know how this feels. It’s uniqueness. The totem allows you to know if you’re in someone else’s dream." This means that (from my POV):

    Spinning = Someone else's dream
    Falling = Own dream OR reality

    Cobb knew the uniqueness of Mal's totem, where as Saito did not. This is also for the "Saito Theory." The theory that Saito was the mastermind behind everything and made Cobb believe the dream world was the real world.
  • Does Cobb ever really wake up when he goes into the chemist's basement with the people on IVs? It could be that Cobb has really been sleeping all along after encountering the chemist.

    This is also an interesting point. I cannot recall if the top stopped or continued spinning when it fell into the sink. It gets confusing because even before the part where he enters Yusuf's shop, it can be said that Cobb is in a dream. The reason why I am saying this is...remember when Cobb meets Eames and the chase scene breaks out? The part where Cobb goes into the impossible alley (the one that is really tight) he makes it out just in time, and very conveniently Saito is there to rescue him. Coincidence? or is Cobb in a dream of his own and he subconsciously created that scenario because he wanted to believe he would escape?

An interesting point to make: Mal and Cobb are the only characters with real development. They could be the only real people.

Good point. There are some theories that say Cobb is in a dream world and Mal was the one who escaped into reality.

The children are the same age at the end. Some people think this means that Cobb is still in the dream. But it could be that Cobb has been gone for only a very short time, and his children haven't aged.

Anyways I think Nolan is really smart for making the plot so open to interpretation. Many people I think, will go see the movie twice or more (more profit for Nolan).

You're right. At the end of the day Nolan used inception himself. I'm going to go watch the movie again to confirm things I have doubts about.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
I second the fact that Nolan used Inception on the audience. Also, is it not possible that Mal was right all along and that perhaps Cobb was dreaming?

*EDIT*

Oups, I didn't read the post above me so I guess that clarifies my question. What if the ending is just another paradox from Nolan, similar to the Penrose staircase...(which was quite well used in the film!)
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I just saw this film and I thought it was amazing. Just going to list off some thoughts and observations:

- so the military created "dream-sharing" for military training?
- i don't understand how the notion of the totem works in the dream. how can you bring a physical object with you in a dream? and if you were merely recreating it in the dream, how could you tell the difference between dream and reality? I understand being able to use it to tell the difference between your own dream and someone elses dream.
- does anyone remember the exactly how much time was compunded from reality, to first dream, to second, etc. ?
 
  • #10
Amazing movie. Just saw it last night.
 
  • #11
Harry marries Ginny Weasley. Ron marries Hermoine.
 
  • #12
KalamMekhar said:
Harry marries Ginny Weasley. Ron marries Hermoine.


You bastard.
 
  • #13
KalamMekhar said:
Ron marries Hermoine.

You got to be kidding. :bugeye:
 
  • #14
Wrong movie?
 
  • #15
Actually there was a point when Cobb was spinning the totem in the bathroom and after it falls over onto the ground, Saito sees this. So, it is possible that Saito does indeed know about the totem.
 
  • #16
vm310 said:
I just saw this film and I thought it was amazing. Just going to list off some thoughts and observations:

- so the military created "dream-sharing" for military training?
- i don't understand how the notion of the totem works in the dream. how can you bring a physical object with you in a dream? and if you were merely recreating it in the dream, how could you tell the difference between dream and reality? I understand being able to use it to tell the difference between your own dream and someone elses dream.
- does anyone remember the exactly how much time was compunded from reality, to first dream, to second, etc. ?

1) I don't recall any such explanation involving military training. The movie simply implies that there exists a modern technology rendering accessibility to one's dream by injecting some compounds (the briefcase from the movie).

2) It's a dream filled with one's subconsciousness. Has it never happened to you dreaming and having in your possession an object from the real world? Cobb's totem was a spinning top. Now, in real world the top would eventually fall and thus it is apparent that this is not a dream. In a dream however one could defy nature's laws and Cobb mentions in the movie that in his dream, the top spins indefinitely, thus implying that he is in fact dreaming. But of course there is a theory that one subconsciousness could modify the state of your totem. For instance, the top COULD fall even though the person is dreaming. Remember the end, when Cobb spins his totem but is distracted by his kids. The top slightly wobbles. Perhaps because Cobb's accept his dream to be a reality, and thus his subconsciousness reacting in the same manner. This remains very elusive...

3) Five minutes of real time would appear as an hour in the first dream, which feels like 10 hours in the next level, and so on.
 
  • #18
vm310 said:
I just saw this film and I thought it was amazing. Just going to list off some thoughts and observations:

- so the military created "dream-sharing" for military training?
- i don't understand how the notion of the totem works in the dream. how can you bring a physical object with you in a dream? and if you were merely recreating it in the dream, how could you tell the difference between dream and reality? I understand being able to use it to tell the difference between your own dream and someone elses dream.
- does anyone remember the exactly how much time was compunded from reality, to first dream, to second, etc. ?

- Yes.

- The totem in a dream is a projection. The idea is that in someone else's dream, the totem behaves differently because that person's subconscious is not aware of how it's supposed to work. In one's own dream, this is not the case, so the totem is useless.

- A factor of 12 at each level. That's why 10 secs before a kick will arrive, the person supervising those dreaming one level below will start playing the music, which tells the dreamers they have 2 minutes until they awake from that level, and tells those dreaming one level below still they have 24 minutes remaining (they hear the music more faintly), etc.
 
  • #19
I agree that Mal and Cobb are the only characters with real development.
 

1. What is the meaning of the ending of Inception?

The ending of Inception is purposely left ambiguous, leaving viewers to interpret it in their own way. Some believe that the top falling indicates that Cobb is in reality, while others argue that it keeps spinning, suggesting he is still in a dream. Director Christopher Nolan has stated that the ending is meant to be subjective and open to interpretation.

2. How does the dream-sharing technology work in Inception?

The dream-sharing technology in Inception involves using a machine to enter the subconscious minds of others through shared dreaming. It requires a sedative to be administered, a dream architect to create the dream world, and a dreamer to guide the dream. The dreamer can control the dream through their own projections, but the architect designs the overall structure of the dream.

3. Is the entire movie a dream?

There are various theories about the entire movie being a dream, but it is ultimately left up to interpretation. Some believe that the movie is a dream from the beginning, while others argue that only certain scenes are dream sequences. Director Christopher Nolan has stated that while he intentionally leaves some ambiguity, he believes that the movie is grounded in reality.

4. What is the significance of the recurring spinning top in Inception?

The spinning top is a totem that Cobb uses to determine if he is in a dream or reality. Since only he knows the weight and feel of the top, it will behave differently in a dream than in reality. However, the top's significance goes beyond just being a totem for Cobb. It represents his guilt and desire to return home to his children.

5. How does the concept of time work in the dream levels of Inception?

Time in the dream levels of Inception is relative and can be manipulated by the dreamer. As the levels go deeper, time slows down, with one hour in reality translating to days in the dream. This allows for more complex and detailed dreams to be created. However, if the dreamer dies, they will be stuck in limbo, a dream state with no concept of time.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
771
Replies
5
Views
394
  • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
642
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
420
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
368
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top