Incorrect explanation of parity violation?

  • Thread starter bcrowell
  • Start date
  • #1
bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
6,723
423

Main Question or Discussion Point

This APS page http://focus.aps.org/story/v22/st19 describes the classic experiment by Wu et al. in the 50's that demonstrated parity violation. It contains the following explanation: "[1] The magnetism of the nuclei can be thought of as resulting from their spin. With the nuclei aligned with their north poles pointing up, the mirror image would reverse their spin and cause the north poles to point down. But upward-emitted electrons will still move upward in the mirror. So if the decay respected mirror symmetry, electrons should be equally likely to be emitted upwards as downwards."

Isn't this exactly backwards? The magnetic field and the angular momentum are both pseudovectors, which you can see because [itex]L=r \times p[/itex] is invariant under parity (both r and p flip). The velocity vector of the emitted betas is a real vector, not a pseudovector. So under parity, the spin *doesn't* reverse, but the direction of emission *does*.

Or am I just on drugs?

[EDIT] OK, I think I have it. I was assuming that when they said "mirror," they meant total parity inversion, not just inversion in a plane. Inversion in a vertical plane would reverse a vertical L vector but not a vertical v vector.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

Related Threads on Incorrect explanation of parity violation?

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
254
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top