Indivisible units of time and the quantum eraser experiment

Gaz1982
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
If we take an indivisible unit of time (a Planck time perhaps), could the possible retro-causality hinted at in the Quantum Eraser Experiment be a process where the retro-causality goes back along the same plank unit rather than back in time per se

Metaphor - I don't travel to a different train carriage, just the back of the same carriage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no indications of indivisible units of time. Time is the same on micro scales as it is in macro scales, it doesn't even have the same rate for different velocities or locations in a gravity well, meaning one second for one location could be two seconds for a different location but the physics remains the same locally. The quantum eraser experiments have been done with not nearly enough time for a delayed choice to affect what occurred at a fork "a long time ago" by photon propagation time scales.

In a train analogy, what happens is when the engine at the front of the train has a choice to go left or right and someone at the back of the train says "I don't know which way we are going". As soon as the engineer determines which track to take, the person at the back of the train "instantly" knows a choice has been made, long before any information could reach them.
 
jerromyjon said:
There is no indications of indivisible units of time. Time is the same on micro scales as it is in macro scales, it doesn't even have the same rate for different velocities or locations in a gravity well, meaning one second for one location could be two seconds for a different location but the physics remains the same locally. The quantum eraser experiments have been done with not nearly enough time for a delayed choice to affect what occurred at a fork "a long time ago" by photon propagation time scales.

In a train analogy, what happens is when the engine at the front of the train has a choice to go left or right and someone at the back of the train says "I don't know which way we are going". As soon as the engineer determines which track to take, the person at the back of the train "instantly" knows a choice has been made, long before any information could reach them.
How could we divide light traveling a Planck length in a vacuum?
 
Gaz1982 said:
How could we divide light traveling a Planck length in a vacuum?
Into as many "slices" of time that makes sense. If it were a very high energy gamma photon, it could have 1000's of waves in that distance.
 
Gaz1982 said:
If we take an indivisible unit of time (a Planck time perhaps), could the possible retro-causality hinted at in the Quantum Eraser Experiment be a process where the retro-causality goes back along the same plank unit rather than back in time per se
There's no particular reason to think that the Planck time is indivisible... but even if it were, how does it compare with the time differences involved in the delayed choice experiment?

jerromyjon said:
If it were a very high energy gamma photon, it could have 1000's of waves in that distance.
It would be a good exercise to calculate the energy of such a photon, see how it compares against the energy of various other interesting phenomena.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top