Solving for Induced Current in a Plane Loop Wire: Faraday's Law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a plane loop of wire and the induced current resulting from a changing magnetic field, specifically applying Faraday's Law. The original poster seeks to understand how to calculate the induced current given the parameters of the problem, including the resistance of the coil.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Faraday's Law to find the induced emf and subsequently the current. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between magnetic flux and induced emf, as well as the importance of considering the change in magnetic field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using Faraday's Law, while others have encouraged the original poster to show their work. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations involved, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning each other's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note variations in the problem, such as changes in the radius of the loop, and discuss the implications of these changes on the calculations. There is also mention of a potential misunderstanding regarding the change in the magnetic field strength.

SwMarc
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Here is a question I have on a practice exam that I am having a littel trouble with.
A plane loop of wire consisting of a single turn if radius 5cm is perpendicular to a magnetic field that increases uniformly in magnitude from 0.5T to 2.5T in 1.5 seconds what is the resluting indiced current if the coil has a resistance of 2ohms?

I am not sure where to procede I need something that leads me to current so finding a voltage would be nice because I already have the resistance.
perhaps using faradays law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SwMarc said:
perhaps using faradays law?

Yes. Can you post your attempt?
 
Just use
\epsilon = \frac{d\phi}{dt}
 
Come on arun, let the original poster show some work!

There's no fun in giving away the answer just like that, is there? The original poster will learn more if he/she figures it out for themselves don't you think :smile:?
 
Well you already said that Faraday's laws are the way to go. I just wrote the mathematical form.
Besides I don't think there is much to do in this problem, otherwise I usually look at the working.

Cheers,
Arun
 
OK I am back. It turns out this problem was on the test with one variation the radius went to 15cm. I used faradays law but got the answer wrong here is what I did.

emf=(pie(.15^2)/1.5=.0471 volts

and then to find the current I=V/R=.0471/2=.0236
 
SwMarc said:
OK I am back. It turns out this problem was on the test with one variation the radius went to 15cm. I used faradays law but got the answer wrong here is what I did.

emf=(pie(.15^2)/1.5=.0471 volts

and then to find the current I=V/R=.0471/2=.0236
The flux is the area times the B field (times a cosine but here the cos gives 1) . So {d \phi \over dt} = A {\Delta B \over \Delta t}. Looks like you forgot the change of B field, \Delta B

Patrick
 
Crap, so the change of B would be two so if I put
emf=(2pie(.15^2)/1.5=.942 volts
and then current would be .942/2=.0471 ohms

Does the answer look good now?
 
SwMarc said:
Crap, so the change of B would be two so if I put
emf=(2pie(.15^2)/1.5=.942 volts
and then current would be .942/2=.0471 ohms

Does the answer look good now?
I get 10 times smaller than your results ( I used 2 T* pi (0.15 m)^2/1.5 s also and got 0.0942 T m^2/s)
 
  • #10
nrqed said:
I get 10 times smaller than your results ( I used 2 T* pi (0.15 m)^2/1.5 s also and got 0.0942 T m^2/s)

I get the same thing as you...apparently I wasnt paying atttention before.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K