Faraday's Law: Induced Voltage and Current in a Loop with Resistance R

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an infinitely long wire carrying a time-varying current and a loop placed at a distance from the wire. Participants are tasked with finding the induced voltage and current in the loop, which has resistance. The subject area includes electromagnetism, specifically Faraday's law of induction and magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to derive the magnetic field from the infinite wire and its dependence on distance. There is a focus on integrating the magnetic field across the loop's area to find the magnetic flux. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of variables and the orientation of the loop relative to the wire.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying assumptions about the problem setup and recognizing the need to integrate the magnetic field for flux calculation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process, but no consensus on the final approach has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding variable notation and the orientation of the loop, which may affect the calculations. There is an acknowledgment of a typo in the original post that could lead to misunderstanding.

horsewnoname

Homework Statement


An infinitely long wire carries current I=I_0sin(wt). A distance a from this wire is an w by l loop with resistance R with induced voltage V and induced current i. Find the induced voltage and current in the loop.

Homework Equations


Faraday's law is given by \varepsilon = \oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=-\frac{d\phi }{dt}where \phi is the magnetic flux given by \int \boldsymbol{B}\cdot d\boldsymbol{s}.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that in order to find the voltage, I need to find the emf which is given by Faraday's law stated above. I pursue this by first coming up with an expression for the magnetic flux.

Although, to do this, I first need to know the magnetic field produced by the infinite wire. From memory (or by Ampere's law), I know this to be B=\frac{\mu _0I}{2\pi r}.

The problem I am having is that the magnetic field is a function of r which bothers me. When I use this magnetic field expression to determine the flux and then take the derivative with respect to time to yield the emf, the result is an expression for the voltage that varies with r which makes no sense. What am I forgetting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
horsewnoname said:

Homework Statement


An infinitely long wire carries current I=I_0sin(wt). A distance a from this wire is an w by l loop with resistance R with induced voltage V and induced current i. Find the induced voltage and current in the loop.
I assume the ##w## in ##\text{sin}(wt)## is supposed to be different than the ##w## in the loop dimensions. I also assume that the loop is in the plane of the wire, is it or is it perpendicular to the wire?
horsewnoname said:
The problem I am having is that the magnetic field is a function of rrr which bothers me. When I use this magnetic field expression to determine the flux and then take the derivative with respect to time to yield the emf, the result is an expression for the voltage that varies with rrr which makes no sense. What am I forgetting?
You have to integrate ##\mathbf{B}## across the area of the loop in order to find ##\phi##.
 
NFuller said:
I assume the ##w## in ##\text{sin}(wt)## is supposed to be different than the ##w## in the loop dimensions. I also assume that the loop is in the plane of the wire, is it or is it perpendicular to the wire?

You have to integrate ##\mathbf{B}## across the area of the loop in order to find ##\phi##.
Yes, of course - I just need to integrate the magnetic field over the dimensions of the loop so that I can get an expression for flux in terms of the given quantities. I feel foolish for not realizing this! And yes, you're assumptions were correct. The w in the sine should actually be an omega - that was my typo. Should I edit my question for posterity or will your stated assumptions suffice?
 
horsewnoname said:
Should I edit my question for posterity or will your stated assumptions suffice?
It should be fine since you have clarified it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K