MHB Induction: Each square can be covered by L-stones

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Square
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

A square with the side length $2^n$ length units (LU) is divided in sub-squares with the side length $1$. One of the sub-squares in the corners has been removed. All other sub-squares should now be covered completely and without overlapping with L-stones. An L-stone consists of three sub-squares that together form an L.

I want to draw the problem for the first three cases described above ($1 \leq n \leq 3$). Then I want to show the following using induction:

For all $n \in N$ the square with side length $2^n$ LU can be covered completely and without overlapping with L-stones, after one of the sub-squares in the corners has been removed.
For the first part:

View attachment 9354

Is the drawing correct? (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • L_stones.png
    L_stones.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 99
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can we use the sketch of the case $n=2$ to get the one of the case $n=3$ ? (Wondering)

Is it maybe as follows?

The upper right sub-square is the one of case $n=2$. For the other sub-squares we have to fill them completely.

(Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Can we use the sketch of the case $n=2$ to get the one of the case $n=3$ ? (Wondering)

Is it maybe as follows?

The upper right sub-square is the one of case $n=2$. For the other sub-squares we have to fill them completely.

Hey mathmari!

I think so yes.
Suppose we use the same case $n=2$ square to fill each of the 4 sub squares of the case $n=3$.
Then we have 3 cells left that we still have to fill don't we?
Can we align them so that we can put another L-square into it? (Wondering)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
I think so yes.
Suppose we use the same case $n=2$ square to fill each of the 4 sub squares of the case $n=3$.
Then we have 3 cells left that we still have to fill don't we?
Can we align them so that we can put another L-square into it? (Wondering)

To do that we have to make the empty cell in that corner so that the three empty cells make a L, or not? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
To do that we have to make the empty cell in that corner so that the three empty cells make a L, or not?

Yes. So the sub squares at left-top, left-bottom, and right-bottom would have their empty cell at the center.
Those empty cells have the shape of an L then, allowing for another piece. (Thinking)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yes. So the sub squares at left-top, left-bottom, and right-bottom would have their empty cell at the center.
Those empty cells have the shape of an L then, allowing for another piece. (Thinking)

I see! Thanks a lot! (Mmm)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top