- #1

Char. Limit

Gold Member

- 1,204

- 14

[tex]1<i[/tex]

[tex]1>i[/tex]

[tex]i<-i[/tex]

[tex]-1<i[/tex]

[tex]-i<i<-1[/tex]

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Char. Limit
- Start date

- #1

Char. Limit

Gold Member

- 1,204

- 14

[tex]1<i[/tex]

[tex]1>i[/tex]

[tex]i<-i[/tex]

[tex]-1<i[/tex]

[tex]-i<i<-1[/tex]

- #2

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 963

- #3

- 1,015

- 3

I guess, the order relations need to obey some sensible rules. With complex numbers you would always get contradictions. You could try to define the order by the modulus of the complex number. But then the universal law

[tex]a<b\qquad\Rightarrow\qquad a+c<b+c[/tex]

would not hold for all complex numbers. Therefore you wouldn't be able to use the most basic properties for rearranging equations with variables.

- #4

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 963

1) if a< b and c is any third member of the field then a+ c< b+ c.

2) if a< b and 0< c, then ac< bc

3) For any two a, b in the field one and only one must be true:

i) a= b

ii) a< b

iii) b< a.

Suppose the Complex number were an ordered field with order "<". Clearly i is not equal to 0 so by (iii) either i< 0 or 0< i.

If i< 0 then, adding -i to both sides, by (i) 0< -i. So by (ii) we must have i(-i)< o(-i) or [itex]-i^2= 1< 0[/itex]. Since this is not necessarily the "usual" order on real numbers that is not yet a contradiction. However, that implies, as before, that 0< -1 and then, multiplying i< 0 by -1, we have -i< 0, contradicting 0< -i above.

Suppose 0< i. Then 0(i)< i(i)= -1. But then 0(-1)< i(-1) so that 0< -i and, adding i to both sides, i< 0, again a contradiction.

Share: