MHB Inequality Challenge: Prove $x^x \ge (x+1/2)^{x+1}$ for $x>0$

AI Thread Summary
The inequality \( x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1} \) for \( x > 0 \) can be proven by analyzing the function \( f(x) = x^x - \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1} \). Taking the logarithm and differentiating leads to the conclusion that \( \ln f(x) \) has a minimum at \( x = 1 \), where \( f(1) = 0 \), thus confirming \( f(x) \geq 0 \) for all \( x > 0 \). An alternative proof using Jensen's Inequality demonstrates that the convexity of \( f(x) = x \ln x \) supports the original inequality. Both methods validate that \( x^x \) is indeed greater than or equal to \( \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1} \) for positive \( x \).
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $$x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}$$ for $x>0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove $$x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)^{x+1}$$ for $x>0$.
[sp]We want to show that $f(x) = x^x - \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1} \geqslant0$ for all $x>0$. Take logs, then differentiate: $$\ln f(x) = x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr),$$ $$\tfrac d{dx}(\ln f(x)) = \ln x + 1 - \ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) - 1 = \ln\bigl( \tfrac{2x}{x+1} \bigr).$$ But $\ln\bigl( \frac{2x}{x+1} \bigr)$ is zero when $x=1$, negative when $x<1$ and positive when $x>1$. Thus $\ln(f(x))$ has a minimum value when $x=1$, hence so does $f(x)$. But $f(1) = 0$. Therefore $f(x)\geqslant0$ for all $x>0$, as required.[/sp]
Edit. Oops! Anemone kindly points out a grotesque blunder in the way I presented that argument. Here is what I should have said.
[sp]Notice that $x^x \geqslant \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}$ is equivalent to $\dfrac{x^x}{\bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}} \geqslant 1$. Take logs to see that this in turn is equivalent to $x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) \geqslant0$. That can be proved as in my attempt above.[/sp]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
[sp]We want to show that $f(x) = x^x - \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1} \geqslant0$ for all $x>0$. Take logs, then differentiate: $$\ln f(x) = x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr),$$ $$\tfrac d{dx}(\ln f(x)) = \ln x + 1 - \ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) - 1 = \ln\bigl( \tfrac{2x}{x+1} \bigr).$$ But $\ln\bigl( \frac{2x}{x+1} \bigr)$ is zero when $x=1$, negative when $x<1$ and positive when $x>1$. Thus $\ln(f(x))$ has a minimum value when $x=1$, hence so does $f(x)$. But $f(1) = 0$. Therefore $f(x)\geqslant0$ for all $x>0$, as required.[/sp]
Edit. Oops! Anemone kindly points out a grotesque blunder in the way I presented that argument. Here is what I should have said.
[sp]Notice that $x^x \geqslant \bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}$ is equivalent to $\dfrac{x^x}{\bigl( \frac{x+1}{2} \bigr)^{x+1}} \geqslant 1$. Take logs to see that this in turn is equivalent to $x\ln x - (x+1)\ln\bigl( \tfrac{x+1}{2} \bigr) \geqslant0$. That can be proved as in my attempt above.[/sp]

Hi Opalg,

Thanks for participating and I want to show you and those who read this thread another method (a method proposed by other) to prove this inequality using the Jensen Inequality...

Let $$f(x)=x \ln x$$

Differentiate the function of f of x twice we got $$f''(x)=\frac{1}{x} (>0) $$ for all $x$.

This means $f(x)$ is a convex function in the domain $x>0$ and Jensen inequality tells us if a function is convex, we have

$$f\left( \frac{\sum x_i}{n}\right) \le \frac{\sum f(x_i)}{n}$$

$$f\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{f(x)+f(1)}{2}$$

$$\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{x\ln x+1 \ln 1}{2}$$

$$\left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le \frac{x\ln x}{2}$$

$$\cancel{2}\left( \frac{x+1}{\cancel{2}}\right) \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right) \le x\ln x$$

$$ \ln \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right)^{x+1} \le \ln x^x$$

$$\therefore x^x \ge \left( \frac{x+1}{2}\right)^{x+1}$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top