MHB Inequality Proof: $\dfrac{2015}{(k+1)(k+4030)}<\dfrac{1}{k+1}$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality $\dfrac{2015}{(k+1)(k+4030)}<\dfrac{1}{k+1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2}+\dfrac{1}{k+3}-\dfrac{1}{k+4}+\cdots+\dfrac{1}{k+4029}-\dfrac{1}{k+4030}$ for $k>0$. It establishes that this is a specific case of a broader inequality that can be proven by induction for $n\geqslant2$. The base case for $n=1$ results in equality, while the inductive step demonstrates that the strict inequality holds for $n=2$. The proof involves manipulating fractions and polynomials to confirm the inequality. The discussion concludes with a participant confirming their own proof using the induction method.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Suppose $k>0$. Show that $\dfrac{2015}{(k+1)(k+4030)}<\dfrac{1}{k+1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2}+\dfrac{1}{k+3}-\dfrac{1}{k+4}+\cdots+\dfrac{1}{k+4029}-\dfrac{1}{k+4030}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Suppose $k>0$. Show that $\dfrac{2015}{(k+1)(k+4030)}<\dfrac{1}{k+1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2}+\dfrac{1}{k+3}-\dfrac{1}{k+4}+\cdots+\dfrac{1}{k+4029}-\dfrac{1}{k+4030}$.
[sp]This is a special case ($n=2015$) of the inequality $$\frac n{(k+1)(k+2n)} < \frac{1}{k+1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2}+\dfrac{1}{k+3}-\dfrac{1}{k+4}+\ldots+\dfrac{1}{k+2n-1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2n},$$ which can be proved by induction for $n\geqslant2$.

In fact, the result almost holds for $n=1$ too, except that in this case the inequality becomes an equality, because $\dfrac1{(k+1)(k+2)} = \dfrac1{k+1} - \dfrac1{k+2}.$ So we can take this as the base case, provided that the proof of the inductive step involves a strict inequality. That will establish that the strict inequality occurs when $n=2$.

So suppose that the inequality holds for some value of $n$. Then $$\frac n{(k+1)(k+2n)} + \dfrac1{k+2n+1} - \dfrac1{k+2n+2} < \frac{1}{k+1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2}+\dfrac{1}{k+3}-\dfrac{1}{k+4}+\ldots+\dfrac{1}{k+2n+1}-\dfrac{1}{k+2n+2}.$$ Since $\dfrac1{k+2n+1} - \dfrac1{k+2n+2} = \dfrac1{(k+2n+1)(k+2n+2)},$ the left side of that inequality is equal to $\dfrac n{(k+1)(k+2n)} + \dfrac1{(k+2n+1)(k+2n+2)}.$

To establish the inductive step, we therefore need to show that $$\dfrac{n+1}{(k+1)(k+2n+2)} < \frac n{(k+1)(k+2n)} + \dfrac1{(k+2n+1)(k+2n+2)}.$$ Multiplying out the fractions, this is equivalent to showing that $$(n+1)(k+2n)(k+2n+1) < n(k+2n+1)(k+2n+2) + (k+1)(k+2n).$$ Now write both sides as polynomials in $k$ to see that this is equivalent to showing that $$(n+1)k^2 + (4n^2 + 5n + 1)k + 2n < (n+1)k^2 + (4n^2 + 5n + 1)k + 4n.$$ But since $4n>2n$, that last inequality obviously holds. That (somewhat inelegantly) establishes the inductive step and proves the result.[/sp]
 
Thanks for participating in this challenge, Opalg!

The solution that I have also prove the inequality with the induction method!(Smile)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top