MHB Inequality proof - for determining convex set

numbersense
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am stuck at the inequality proof of this convext set problem.

$\Omega = \{ \textbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^2 | x_1^2 - x_2 \leq 6 \}$

The set should be a convex set, meaning for $\textbf{x}, \textbf{y} \in \mathbb{R}^2$ and $\theta \in [0,1]$, $\theta \textbf{x} + (1-\theta)\textbf{y}$ also belong to $\Omega$.

How can I show that $(\theta x_1 + (1-\theta)y_1)^2 - (\theta x_2 + (1-\theta)y_2) \leq 6$?

I am stuck after expanding the LHS.
\begin{align*}
& (\theta x_1 + (1-\theta)y_1)^2 - (\theta x_2 + (1-\theta)y_2) \\
=& \theta^2 x_1^2 + 2\theta(1 - \theta)x_1 y_1 + (1 - \theta)^2 y_1^2 - \theta x_2 - (1 - \theta) y_2
\end{align*}

Any hints or pointers are welcome. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
numbersense said:
I am stuck at the inequality proof of this convext set problem.

$\Omega = \{ \textbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^2 | x_1^2 - x_2 \leq 6 \}$

The set should be a convex set, meaning for $\textbf{x}, \textbf{y} \in \mathbb{R}^2$ and $\theta \in [0,1]$, $\theta \textbf{x} + (1-\theta)\textbf{y}$ also belong to $\Omega$.

How can I show that $(\theta x_1 + (1-\theta)y_1)^2 - (\theta x_2 + (1-\theta)y_2) \leq 6$?

I am stuck after expanding the LHS.
\begin{align*}
& (\theta x_1 + (1-\theta)y_1)^2 - (\theta x_2 + (1-\theta)y_2) \\
=& \theta^2 x_1^2 + 2\theta(1 - \theta)x_1 y_1 + (1 - \theta)^2 y_1^2 - \theta x_2 - (1 - \theta) y_2
\end{align*}

Any hints or pointers are welcome. Thanks in advance.

Welcome to MHB, numbersense! :)

Graphically, your problem is that any weighted mean of 2 points above the parabola $x^2-6$ is also above that parabola.
Something like this:

View attachment 721

Summarized, your problem is that:
$$\text{Given} \\
\qquad x_2 \ge x_1^2 - 6 \qquad (1) \\
\qquad y_2 \ge y_1^2 - 6 \qquad (2) \\
\text{Proof that: } \theta x_2 + (1-\theta)y_2 \ge (\theta x_1 + (1-\theta)y_1)^2 - 6 \qquad (3)$$

Starting with the LHS of (3), we get with (1) and (2) that:
$$\theta x_2 + (1-\theta)y_2 \ge \theta (x_1^2 - 6) + (1-\theta)(y_1^2 - 6) = \theta x_1^2 + (1-\theta)y_1^2 - 6 \qquad (4)$$

So we're left to proof that:
$$(\theta x_1^2 + (1-\theta)y_1^2) - (\theta x_1 + (1-\theta)y_1)^2 \overset{?}{\ge} 0 \qquad (5)$$

Can you simplify that?
 

Attachments

  • problem-parabola.png
    problem-parabola.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 81
Thank you I like Serena! I think I managed to simplify that.

\begin{align*}
& \theta x_1^2 + (1 - \theta) y_1^2 - (\theta x_1 + (1-\theta) y_1)^2 \\
=& \theta x_1^2 + (1-\theta)y_1^2 - ( \theta^2 x_1^2 + 2 (\theta - \theta^2) x_1 y_1 + (1-2\theta + \theta^2) y_1^2)\\
=& (\theta - \theta^2) x_1^2 - 2(\theta - \theta^2)x_1 y_1 + (\theta - \theta^2) y_1^2\\
=& \left((\theta - \theta^2)^\frac{1}{2} x_1 - (\theta - \theta^2)^\frac{1}{2} y_1\right)^2\\
\geq & 0
\end{align*}

$\theta - \theta^2 \geq 0$ as $\theta \in [0,1]$.
 
numbersense said:
Thank you I like Serena! I think I managed to simplify that.

\begin{align*}
& \theta x_1^2 + (1 - \theta) y_1^2 - (\theta x_1 + (1-\theta) y_1)^2 \\
=& \theta x_1^2 + (1-\theta)y_1^2 - ( \theta^2 x_1^2 + 2 (\theta - \theta^2) x_1 y_1 + (1-2\theta + \theta^2) y_1^2)\\
=& (\theta - \theta^2) x_1^2 - 2(\theta - \theta^2)x_1 y_1 + (\theta - \theta^2) y_1^2\\
=& \left((\theta - \theta^2)^\frac{1}{2} x_1 - (\theta - \theta^2)^\frac{1}{2} y_1\right)^2\\
\geq & 0
\end{align*}

$\theta - \theta^2 \geq 0$ as $\theta \in [0,1]$.

Yep! ;)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top