Inequality proof w/ induction, 2 unknowns

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality \((1+x)^n \geq 1 + nx\) for every real number \(x > -1\) and natural numbers \(n \geq 2\) using mathematical induction. Participants explore the application of induction, the base case, and the inductive step without utilizing the Binomial Theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the initial steps of the proof, establishing the base case for \(n=2\) and expressing uncertainty about progressing to the inductive step.
  • Another participant suggests using the inductive hypothesis to derive a weak inequality that can be added to the existing inequality from the induction step.
  • A later reply discusses the concept of a "weak inequality" and connects it to the idea of ensuring that terms like \(mx^2\) are non-negative.
  • Further contributions clarify how to manipulate the expressions to show that \((1+x)^{m+1} \geq 1 + (m+1)x\) holds true by building on the previous steps.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to the proof and the validity of the steps taken, but there is some uncertainty regarding the terminology and the specific inequalities used in the inductive step.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the transition from the inductive hypothesis to the inductive step, particularly in constructing the necessary inequalities. The discussion does not resolve all aspects of these transitions, leaving some assumptions and steps open to interpretation.

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I am given a statement to prove: Show (without using the Binomial Theorem) that \((1+x)^n\geq{1+nx}\) for every real number \(x>-1\) and natural numbers \(n\geq{2}\). I am given a hint to fix \(x\) and apply induction on \(n\).
I started by supposing \(x\) is a fixed, real number larger than -1, and then calling the given formula \(P(n)\), and evaluating \(P(n)\) at the base case \(n=2\).
This gives \((1+x)^2\geq{1+2x}\) which can be rewritten as \(1+2x+x^2\geq{1+2x}\).
It is know that for all real \(x\), the statement \(x^2\geq{0}\) is true.

Here is where I get tripped up.
We need to assume that \(m=n\) a.k.a. \(P(m)\) is true for all natural \(m\geq{2}\).
So we have \((1+x)^m\geq{1+mx}\). Now we need to show that \(P(m+1)\) holds to be true. \(P(m+1)\):
\((1+x)^{m+1}\geq{1+(m+1)x}\).
Now here I would usually try to translate the original formula by plugging in what we had originally, but I am pretty iffy on how to do this with an inequality. If anybody could help me construct a new formula that would help me prove that
\((1+x)^{m+1}\geq{1+(m+1)x}\) is true I would be very thankful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skatenerd said:
I am given a statement to prove: Show (without using the Binomial Theorem) that \((1+x)^n\geq{1+nx}\) for every real number \(x>-1\) and natural numbers \(n\geq{2}\). I am given a hint to fix \(x\) and apply induction on \(n\).
I started by supposing \(x\) is a fixed, real number larger than -1, and then calling the given formula \(P(n)\), and evaluating \(P(n)\) at the base case \(n=2\).
This gives \((1+x)^2\geq{1+2x}\) which can be rewritten as \(1+2x+x^2\geq{1+2x}\).
It is know that for all real \(x\), the statement \(x^2\geq{0}\) is true.

Here is where I get tripped up.
We need to assume that \(m=n\) a.k.a. \(P(m)\) is true for all natural \(m\geq{2}\).
So we have \((1+x)^m\geq{1+mx}\). Now we need to show that \(P(m+1)\) holds to be true. \(P(m+1)\):
\((1+x)^{m+1}\geq{1+(m+1)x}\).
Now here I would usually try to translate the original formula by plugging in what we had originally, but I am pretty iffy on how to do this with an inequality. If anybody could help me construct a new formula that would help me prove that
\((1+x)^{m+1}\geq{1+(m+1)x}\) is true I would be very thankful.

\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 1 + x \right) ^{m + 1} &= \left( 1 + x \right) \left( 1 + x \right) ^m \\ &\geq \left( 1 + x \right) \left( 1 + m\,x \right) \\ &= 1 + \left( m + 1 \right) \, x + m\,x^2 \\ &\geq 1 + \left( m + 1 \right) \, x \end{align*}
 
Okay, you have shown the base case is true, and so your induction hypothesis $P_m$ is:

$$(1+x)^m\ge1+mx$$

I would consider for the inductive step:

$$(1+x)^{m+1}-(1+x)^{m}=(1+x)^{m}(1+x-1)=(1+x)^{m}x$$

Can you use the inductive hypothesis to construct from this a weak inequality that you can then add to $P_m$?
 
Thanks to both of you for the responses. So I was actually able to figure out and finish the proof going by what Prove It wrote. But to MarkFL, what do you mean by constructing a "weak inequality"? Does that refer to the point where you find an inequality where you have \(mx^2\geq{0}\)?
 
What I had in mind is to take the equation:

$$(1+x)^{m+1}-(1+x)^{m}=(1+x)^{m}x$$

and then use the induction hypothesis (which we have multiplied by $x$) to write:

$$(1+x)^{m}x\ge(1+mx)x$$

so that we now have:

$$(1+x)^{m+1}-(1+x)^{m}\ge(1+mx)x$$

Adding this to $P_m$, we get:

$$(1+x)^{m+1}\ge 1+mx+(1+mx)x=1+(m+1)x+mx^2$$

Since $mx^2\ge0$, we have:

$$(1+x)^{m+1}\ge1+(m+1)x+mx^2\ge1+(m+1)x$$

And so we may conclude:

$$(1+x)^{m+1}\ge1+(m+1)x$$

Thus, we have derived $P_{m+1}$ from $P_{m}$, thereby completing the proof by induction.
 
Ahh I see. Yeah I ended up writing something similar to that, with the same ending. Thanks for the help guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K