Inertia Matching with TWO or more motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter hp1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Motors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Using multiple electric motors can theoretically split inertia loads evenly among them, as described by the equation 1/2Mr². However, practical applications reveal that perfect synchronization and identical mechanical connections are unattainable, leading to increased backlash and reduced rigidity. Instead of adding motors, opting for a larger frame size motor is often more advantageous, providing greater torque and rotor inertia without increasing parts count. Implementing a preload technique with two motors can also mitigate backlash, enhancing overall performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inertia calculations, specifically 1/2Mr²
  • Knowledge of servo systems and their dynamics
  • Familiarity with mechanical rigidity and backlash concepts
  • Experience with motor sizing and selection for applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for minimizing backlash in servo systems
  • Explore the advantages of larger frame size motors in dynamic applications
  • Learn about preload methods in multi-motor configurations
  • Investigate the impact of mechanical rigidity on motor performance
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, robotics developers, and anyone involved in designing or optimizing multi-motor systems for dynamic applications.

hp1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Been trying to find an answer to this all day. Would really appreciate any help!

Assuming the electric motors are perfectly synced-up, would using multiple motors effectively split the inertia loads evenly among the 2/3/4 motors?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but with the equation 1/2Mr^2 for inertia loads, each motor is essentially responsible for moving half the mass (or 1/3, 1/4 and so on and so forth), it seems the inertia would logically also be cut by the same ratio.

Thanks in advanced for any help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hp1 said:
...

Assuming the electric motors are perfectly synced-up, would using multiple motors effectively split the inertia loads evenly among the 2/3/4 motors?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but with the equation 1/2Mr^2 for inertia loads, each motor is essentially responsible for moving half the mass (or 1/3, 1/4 and so on and so forth), it seems the inertia would logically also be cut by the same ratio.

...

Assuming that you are talking about a servo or other dynamic system, the main reason for inertia matching is to minimize control issues due to backlash and lack of rigidity in the system between load and motor.

If as you suggest, the motors are perfectly synchronized, and mechanical connections were identical in terms of total rigidity and backlash, I think that you are theoretically correct that only total rotor inertia matters (whether from 1, 2, 3 or 100 motors).

Practically, this isn't possible; there is always a compromise. Additional motors would likely result in an increase in effective backlash and loss of rigidity. Although the total motor inertia and theoretical mismatch may be the same, dynamic performance would be compromised if only to a small and acceptable degree (depending on application).

I have found that going to the next larger frame size motor offers several advantage over increasing the number of motors (torque and rotor inertia more than double, no parts count increase, cost typically doesn't double). Also, 2 small shaft connections will have more backlash and less rigidity than one larger diameter shaft. These points of course don't matter if you can't fit the larger motor in the machine.

Running 2 motors with one slightly behind the other in order to create preload may eliminate backlash in the system and allow the 2 motors to work better than one. I have heard of this being done on large rack and pinion systems to eliminate backlash. There will be some power lost to this preload, but it may offset the other issues.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K