A Inertial mass, the Higgs field, and Mach's Principle

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Iskandarani
  • Start date Start date
Iskandarani
Messages
15
Reaction score
7
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia).

My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like Mach's Principle, which suggests that inertia arises from a particle's interaction with the rest of the matter in the universe? Does a particle's Higgs-derived mass depend on the large-scale distribution of matter, or are they considered completely independent concepts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inertia is just another word for mass. That said Newton's laws don't apply to elementary particle physics.
 
Iskandarani said:
How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass
Yes.

Iskandarani said:
is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure?
Only in the sense that "the vacuum structure" has the fact that spacetime is locally Minkowskian built into it, and that embodies the connection between mass and proper acceleration.

Iskandarani said:
how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like Mach's Principle
It doesn't. Mach's Principle is embodied in General Relativity (at least to some extent--the opinions of physicists vary on this), but it has nothing to do with the particular structure of matter.

Iskandarani said:
Does a particle's Higgs-derived mass depend on the large-scale distribution of matter
No.

Iskandarani said:
are they considered completely independent concepts?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and PeroK
Thank you, @PeroK and @PeterDonis, for the very clear answers.

That perfectly clarifies the scope of the Standard Model on this topic: the Higgs mechanism accounts for rest mass, but inertia itself is an inherent property within the geometric structure of spacetime. I appreciate you taking the time to confirm this distinction.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top