Inertial mass, the Higgs field, and Mach's Principle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Iskandarani
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between the Higgs mechanism, inertia, and Mach's Principle within the context of the Standard Model of particle physics. Participants examine whether inertia is merely a property of mass or if it has deeper connections to vacuum structure and the distribution of matter in the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the Standard Model accounts for inertia and whether it is simply a property of mass or if there is a deeper connection to vacuum structure.
  • Another participant asserts that inertia is synonymous with mass and notes that Newton's laws do not apply to elementary particle physics.
  • A response indicates that the vacuum structure relates to the local Minkowskian nature of spacetime, which connects mass and proper acceleration.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and Mach's Principle, with one stating that Mach's Principle is more relevant to General Relativity and does not connect to the structure of matter.
  • It is proposed that a particle's Higgs-derived mass does not depend on the large-scale distribution of matter and that the concepts of Higgs mass and inertia are independent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between inertia, mass, and the Higgs mechanism. While some agree on the independence of these concepts, others question the depth of their connections, leaving the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the implications of Mach's Principle and the nature of inertia in relation to the Higgs mechanism and vacuum structure.

Iskandarani
Messages
15
Reaction score
7
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia).

My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like Mach's Principle, which suggests that inertia arises from a particle's interaction with the rest of the matter in the universe? Does a particle's Higgs-derived mass depend on the large-scale distribution of matter, or are they considered completely independent concepts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inertia is just another word for mass. That said Newton's laws don't apply to elementary particle physics.
 
Iskandarani said:
How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass
Yes.

Iskandarani said:
is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure?
Only in the sense that "the vacuum structure" has the fact that spacetime is locally Minkowskian built into it, and that embodies the connection between mass and proper acceleration.

Iskandarani said:
how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like Mach's Principle
It doesn't. Mach's Principle is embodied in General Relativity (at least to some extent--the opinions of physicists vary on this), but it has nothing to do with the particular structure of matter.

Iskandarani said:
Does a particle's Higgs-derived mass depend on the large-scale distribution of matter
No.

Iskandarani said:
are they considered completely independent concepts?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and PeroK
Thank you, @PeroK and @PeterDonis, for the very clear answers.

That perfectly clarifies the scope of the Standard Model on this topic: the Higgs mechanism accounts for rest mass, but inertia itself is an inherent property within the geometric structure of spacetime. I appreciate you taking the time to confirm this distinction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K