MHB Infinitely Many Pairs: Integer Roots of Quadratic Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
how can we show that there are infinitely many pairs $(a,b)$ such that both the quadratic equations -

$x^2 + ax +b = 0$ and $x^2 +2ax +b = 0$ have integer roots
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: infinity many pairs

I'll get you started. What is an integer root? A quadratic equation x^2 + ax + b = 0 yields integer roots when \frac{-a \pm \sqrt{a^2 - 4b}}{2} is an integer, with a, b \in \mathbb{Z} (a and b don't need to be relative numbers but if we can prove there are infinitely many pairs of relative numbers \left (a, b \right ) we don't need to worry about non-integers).

Clearly if \frac{-a \pm \sqrt{a^2 - 4b}}{2} is an integer, then -a \pm \sqrt{a^2 - 4b} is one too.

Can you follow this reasoning to the end and establish a condition on a and b such that the resulting quadratic has integer roots? Then, do the same for the other equation with 2a instead and put all the conditions together. Then, prove that all these conditions are satisfied for infinitely many pairs \left (a, b \right ) and you will be done. Does that make sense?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top