Information loss when taking the dot product of vector equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the information loss when taking the dot product of vector equations compared to higher rank tensors. It is established that taking the dot product of vectors, as shown in the equation $$\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{b}\Rightarrow\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{x}$$, results in an underdetermined system, leading to potential information loss. Conversely, when using higher rank tensors, such as in $$\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{b}\Longleftrightarrow\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{T}=\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{T}$$, the injectivity of the transformation allows for unique solutions, preserving information.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector equations and dot products
  • Familiarity with higher rank tensors and their properties
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly systems of equations
  • Comprehension of regular transformations and their inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of higher rank tensors in linear algebra
  • Learn about injective functions and their role in preserving information
  • Explore the implications of underdetermined systems in vector equations
  • Investigate the concept of regular transformations and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with vector equations, tensor analysis, and linear systems will benefit from this discussion.

Van Ladmon
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is the following conclusion correct? Assume there's an equation with vectors on both sides. Taking the dot product of this equation with vectors on both sides loses information, but information will not lose when taking dot products with higher rank tensors on both sides. What's the reason behind this?

Homework Equations


$$\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{b}\Rightarrow\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{x}$$
$$\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{b}\Longleftrightarrow\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{T}=\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{T}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


In the second situation, it is always feasible to take the dot product of the inverse tensor on both sides and the equation with be restored.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Van Ladmon said:

Homework Statement


Is the following conclusion correct? Assume there's an equation with vectors on both sides. Taking the dot product of this equation with vectors on both sides loses information, but information will not lose when taking dot products with higher rank tensors on both sides. What's the reason behind this?

Homework Equations


$$\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{b}\Rightarrow\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{x}$$
$$\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{b}\Longleftrightarrow\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{T}=\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{T}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


In the second situation, it is always feasible to take the dot product of the inverse tensor on both sides and the equation with be restored.
In the first case, we have ##(a\cdot x - b\cdot x)=(a-b)\cdot x =0 ## which means, all ##x## perpendicular to ##a-b## fulfill this equation. This means, that there is no unique ##x##, which thus cannot be canceled to get back ##a-b=0##. Exception: dimension one.

In the second case, ##T## represents (implicitly assumed by you) a regular transformation. Regularity means, we can invert it. Or with the argument above: ##(a-b)\cdot T = 0## and injectivity of ##T## allows us to conclude ##a-b=0##.
More elementary said, the second equation are actually at least as many equations as the dimension of ##a,b## is, and thus we can uniquely solve a system of linear equations. In the previous case, we had dimension many unknowns and only one equation, which yields to an underdetermined system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
600
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
722
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K