Inhomogeneous wave equation: RHS orthogonal to homogeneous solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inhomogeneous wave equation given by $$\nabla^2u_1+\frac{\omega^2_0}{V_0}u_1 = R(r)$$ and the condition for its finite solution, which requires the right-hand term \(R(r)\) to be orthogonal to all solutions of the corresponding homogeneous equation. This orthogonality condition, expressed as $$\iint_{\text{all space}} u_1^*R(r) dr = 0$$, is attributed to the self-adjoint nature of the wave operator. The necessity of this condition is demonstrated through the properties of adjoint operators in the context of linear differential equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inhomogeneous wave equations
  • Familiarity with self-adjoint operators in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Basic principles of partial differential equations (PDEs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of self-adjoint operators in functional analysis
  • Explore the implications of orthogonality in solutions of PDEs
  • Learn about adjoint operators and their role in differential equations
  • Investigate Brillouin's 'Wave Propagation in Periodic Media' for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and mathematicians interested in wave propagation, particularly those working with partial differential equations and self-adjoint operators.

ollielgg
Messages
2
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Brillouin states that an inhomogeneous hyperbolic PDE has a finite solution only if the RHS is orthogonal to the homogenous solutions
Hi, I've been reading Brillouin's 'Wave Propagation in Periodic Media'.

About the following equation
$$\nabla^2u_1+\frac{\omega^2_0}{V_0}u_1 = R(r)$$
Brillouin states that "it is well known that such an equation possesses a finite solution only if the right-hand term is orthogonal to all solutions of the homogeneous equation:"
$$\iint_{\text{all space}} u_1^*R(r) dr = 0$$

This is not a property of hyperbolic PDEs I've come across before. I wasn't able to find anything in my PDE textbooks. Would anyone be able to suggest why this is the case? I would be very appreciative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
It has nothing to do with the class of PDEs; it is true because the wave operator is self-adjoint. If it weren't, then the right-hand term needs to be orthogonal to solutions of the homogeneous adjoint equation. To show it is necessary, assume ##L x = a## has a solution, where the operator ##L## has adjoint ##L^\dagger##, and let ##z## be any solution of ##L^\dagger z = 0##. Then we have
$$
0 = \left\langle x, L^\dagger z \right\rangle = \left\langle L x, z \right\rangle = \left\langle a, z \right\rangle
$$
where ##\left\langle a, z \right\rangle## indicates the inner product of ##a## and ##z##.

jason
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot! This is a big help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF and jim mcnamara
You are welcome. Also, welcome to Physics Forums! I didn't notice that was your first post.

I hope you enjoy Brillouin's book. I have looked at it on a number of occasions and it looks pretty interesting and has lots of pretty pictures of Brillouin zones! But I have never taken the time to work through it.

Jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
627
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K