Initial Value Problem for a System of Linear Differential Equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
35 replies · 7K views
We have

$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-(m_0+m_1) & m_1 & 0 \\ m_1 & -(m_1+m_2+m_3) & m_3 \\ 0 & m_3 & -(m_3+m_4)\end{pmatrix}$$

$$C=\begin{pmatrix}45m_0\\20\\35m_4\end{pmatrix}$$

So, we have to solve $X=-A^{-1}C$ subject to $z>x$, right?? (Wondering)

- - - Updated - - -

I like Serena said:
I believe you're supposed to find the solution for $X = X(t)$, which contains factors $e^{\lambda t}$.
Those terms with $e^{\lambda t}$ will not and cannot be zero. (Wasntme)

We will get three relations of the form $e^{\lambda t}=0$, right?? What does this mean?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
We have

$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-(m_0+m_1) & m_1 & 0 \\ m_1 & -(m_1+m_2+m_3) & m_3 \\ 0 & m_3 & -(m_3+m_4)\end{pmatrix}$$

$$C=\begin{pmatrix}45m_0\\20\\35m_4\end{pmatrix}$$

So, we have to solve $X=-A^{-1}C$ subject to $z>x$, right?? (Wondering)

Yep. (Smile)

- - - Updated - - -

We will get three relations of the form $e^{\lambda t}=0$, right?? What does this mean?? (Wondering)

I'm not so sure that's what we will get. How did you get it? (Wondering)
If we would, there would be no solution. (Wasntme)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. (Smile)

How can we find the inverse of $A$?? I got stuck right now...
 
I like Serena said:
I'm not so sure that's what we will get. How did you get it? (Wondering)
If we would, there would be no solution. (Wasntme)

$\lambda$ is negative... So, that means that $t \rightarrow +\infty$, or not?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
How can we find the inverse of $A$?? I got stuck right now...

I'm not quite clear on the problem.
Aren't all $m_i$ values given? (Wondering)
Wouldn't it only be $m_1$ that we make variable?