Input Energy of Radioactive Decays

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy dynamics of radioactive decays, specifically alpha decay, and the role of quantum mechanical tunneling in overcoming energy barriers. Unlike fusion, where multiple particles must collide and tunnel through a barrier, radioactive decay involves a single particle that has a probability of decaying over time, regardless of the energy available. The energy released during decay is closely linked to the energy barrier that must be overcome, but they are not identical. Quantum tunneling allows particles to pass through barriers that would otherwise prevent decay.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with radioactive decay processes, particularly alpha decay
  • Knowledge of energy barriers in nuclear physics
  • Basic concepts of quantum tunneling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum tunneling in nuclear physics
  • Study the mechanics of alpha decay and its energy dynamics
  • Explore the relationship between energy barriers and decay probabilities
  • Investigate the photoelectric effect and field emission as examples of tunneling
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear engineers, and students studying quantum mechanics or nuclear physics who seek to understand the intricacies of radioactive decay and energy barriers.

A M
Messages
83
Reaction score
16
TL;DR
We know that nuclear fusion doesn't occur under normal conditions (e.g. in a helium balloon).
Because for the fusion of even the lightest elements (like hydrogen isotopes), fairly high energy is needed to 'break' the electrostatic repulsion barrier; although the released energy might be much higher.
But how about some radioactive decays? (α, SF, CD, ...)
Don't we need energy to to separate some nucleons of a radioactive nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, decays also need to overcome an energy barrier. This is done through quantum mechanical tunneling through the energy barrier. The difference in relation to fusion is that you only have a single radioactive particle and even a small probability per time of decaying will eventually lead to a decay. For fusion, the particles also need to meet up and when they do they have a single chance of tunneling through the energy barrier with very low proability.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and A M
Orodruin said:
Yes, decays also need to overcome an energy barrier.
Would you please explain a little more?
 
For example of tunnelling where it is electrons that tunnel: we can observe both field emission and photoelectric effect. There is a definite energy barrier (as demonstrated by photoelectric effect) and yet electrons do have a small chance of getting through without any additional energy (as shown by field emission).
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, decays also need to overcome an energy barrier. This is done through quantum mechanical tunneling through the energy barrier. The difference in relation to fusion is that you only have a single radioactive particle and even a small probability per time of decaying will eventually lead to a decay.
What does this probability come from? The higher energy they need to overcome that barrier or sth more complicated?
 
Yes. We had this discussion and even a graph for alpha decays in the previous thread. The energy released is not directly the same as the energy barrier but the two are closely linked.
 
Thank you for the reply, but I haven't quite understood.
What if the nuclei were in a situation without that amount of energy available? The decay wouldn't occur?
 
A M said:
Thank you for the reply, but I haven't quite understood.
What if the nuclei were in a situation without that amount of energy available? The decay wouldn't occur?
Yes it would. It is quantum tunnelling. In quantum mechanics a particle can pass an energy barrier that it classically would not be able to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and A M

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K