Inserting dielectric into isolated capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of inserting a dielectric slab into an isolated capacitor, specifically analyzing two cases of polarization timing. In Case 1, where the slab polarizes immediately, energy is used for both pulling the slab and polarization, resulting in a combination of kinetic and polarization energy. In Case 2, where polarization takes a long time, all energy is dedicated to polarization, leading to potentially higher steady-state polarization. The conversation highlights the complexities of dielectric behavior and the importance of understanding transient versus steady-state conditions in capacitors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor fundamentals, including the formula U = (1/2)CV^2.
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their polarization mechanisms.
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles in electrical systems.
  • Basic grasp of transient versus steady-state behavior in electrical circuits.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of dielectric constant on capacitor performance.
  • Study transient analysis in capacitive circuits using simulation tools like SPICE.
  • Explore the relationship between dielectric polarization time and energy conservation.
  • Investigate practical applications of dielectrics in capacitive sensors and energy storage devices.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and students studying capacitor design and dielectric materials will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the dynamics of dielectric insertion and its effects on energy storage and polarization.

SpartanG345
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
U = (1/2)CV^2 = (1/2)Q^2 /C

Increasing C while keeping Q constant (isolated capacitor) will decrease the energy contained in the capacitor by and amount X
Where does this X energy come from?

Case 1 (slab polarizes immediately when it crosses the electric field of the plates)

The capacitor tugs on the slab, so does work on it,
If no friction, slab oscillates back and forth with constant
transferring between kinetic and potential energy.

Case 2 (slab takes a very long time to polarize)

The plate can be moved into position without the electric field of the capacitor doing any work. Once in position after along time the slab gets polarized. Thus all of the energy X must go into polarizing the slab.

In case 1, energy is used to pull in the slab as well as polarize the slab. There will be a point in case 1 where the slab is centred. At this point
X would have been converted to: Ke + Polarization energy (stored in the induced electric field)

Where as in case 2
X would have been converted to: Polarization energy only
Does this mean the case 2 slab will be more polarised (in the steady state)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It goes into polarizing the dielectric.
If you'd been holding the slab, you would, indeed, have felt it.

In the case where the polarization takes a long time, the effect would just be initially as if the material were not a dielectric at all and the dielectric constant would change over time as the slab polarized.
 
Does this mean that in the first case there will be less polarization since when the slab in centered it will have some kinetic energy as well being polarized
 
You can get really tangled up with dielectrics. This is why your exercises and examples are all steady-state and static. Transient behavior can be very complicated.

As the dielectric falls between the plates, some of the dielectric will be polarized, some will be in the process of becoming polarized, and some will be unpolarized. There are no sharp boundaries, and the dipoles will affect their neighbors.

In the case of a very long polarization time, it is possible for the dielectric to fall completely through the plates without becoming polarized at all.

It is good that you are thinking about this because there are a lot of pmm proposals based on misunderstanding how dielectrics work.
 
Thanks for the reply, i updated my question a little.

What i am still confused about, is how there could be different levels of polarization, which is dependent on how the dielectric is introduced into the system. (case 1 and 2)

- based on energy conservation
 
The steady-state polarization should be the same in each case.
In the second case, you'd just have to wait longer for this to happen.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
670
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K