Instantaneous Unit Conversion between CGS and SI units

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conversion of the CGS unit "erg/(sec rad cm)" to SI units for power, specifically watts. Participants clarify that this unit may represent intensity rather than power, suggesting it should be expressed in steradians instead of radians. The original poster confirms the context involves synchrotron radiation from a particle beam, linking it to the relativistic Larmor formula. They eventually found a different equation in SI units that provided reasonable results, highlighting confusion due to inconsistent unit usage in reference materials. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding unit contexts in physics.
KJ4EPE
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In doing some research, I cam across an equation for instantaneous radiated power, with the CGS units "erg/(sec rad cm)", rad being radians (not rad the unit for radiation exposure). Try as I might, I'm not able to come up with a way to convert it to the SI units for watts. Does anyone know where I might find the information about this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi KJ4EPE! :smile:

Are you sure this is power? erg/(sec rad cm) looks more like some form of intensity …

there's a useful table of intensities and radiances at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensity_(physics)"

but I can't see anything there equivalent to erg/(sec rad cm) :confused:

(and I'd expect steradian instead of radian … erg/(sec rad cm) looks to me cylindrical rather than spherical … is this for a "cylindrical" transmitter?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually it is! It's for determining the power of synchrotron radiation emitted from a particle beam, essentially the relativistic form of the Larmor formula. But anyway, someone at work was able to point me in the direction of a different equation in SI units, and the results seem to be reasonable. I was confused cause one of the books I was using this morning used the same equation for both SI and CGS units, and I had a hard time figuring out what to use.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top