B Integer solutions for equations

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter 69911e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding integer solutions for equations involving positive integers, specifically in the context of a project related to prime numbers. The user is exploring how to derive a formula for C5 in the equation (C1 * X) + C2 = (C3 * Y) + C4 = (C1 * C3 * n) + C5, where C1, C2, C3, and C4 are constants. They reference the Chinese remainder theorem as a basis for existence and mention that the coefficients C1 and C3 are co-prime. While a direct closed formula for C5 may not exist, an algorithm can be employed to find solutions, particularly when limited to two equations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not getting bogged down in complex calculations while working on the project.
69911e
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
I am trying to understand how to find solutions for a problem when parameters are limited to positive integers.
Example:
30x+19= 7y+1 =a ; where x,y,a are positive integers

Wolframalpha outputs:
a = 210 n + 169, x = 7 n + 5, y = 30 n + 24, n element Z(integers)

30*7= 210 (obviously)
How do I calculate 169? I can do it by hand, but am likely missing something obvious generating a universal equation.

I am trying to find a formula to solve for C5 below:
(C1 * X) +C2 = (C3*Y) + C4 = (C1*C3*n) +C5 ; where C1,C2,C3,C4 are constants and X,Y,n are the set of positive integers. Looking for a formula for smallest integer solution C5

Any suggestions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The existence is a result of the Chinese remainder theorem, and with the formulas there you can also construct the smallest solution.

##30x+19=a## can be interpreted as ##a=19 \pmod{30}##.
 
MFB: Thanks for the link.
I forgot to specify, coefficients (C1&C3) of x and y are also defined as co-prime.

This is a small part of a (non-school) prime number related summer project I am working on with my 13&16 year old and we trying no to get bogged down on this equation. If it does not a have a formula solution for C5 (above), we may need to move onto a different path.
 
There is an algorithm to find it. It is not directly a nice closed formula.
 
MFB: It seems not too complex of an algorithm if limited to 2 equations. We may be able to use it and define the bounds needed.
Thanks
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top