Integrands that vanish everywhere

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StatusX
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical principle that if the integral of a function \( f(\vec x) \) over any region \( D \) equals zero, then the integrand must vanish identically everywhere in the space. The initial argument suggests that if \( f(\vec x) \) does not vanish in some region, the integral would yield a non-zero result. However, it is clarified that this only guarantees the integrand vanishes almost everywhere, except possibly on a set of measure zero. The conclusion emphasizes that continuity of the function ensures that if \( f(x) \) is non-zero at any point, it must also be positive in a neighborhood, leading to a non-zero integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integrals and regions in mathematical analysis
  • Familiarity with concepts of measure theory
  • Knowledge of continuity in functions
  • Basic principles of physics related to mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of measure theory in integrals
  • Explore the properties of continuous functions and their integrals
  • Investigate the role of integrals in physics, particularly in field theories
  • Learn about Lebesgue integration and its advantages over Riemann integration
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students studying mathematical analysis, particularly those interested in the properties of integrals and their applications in physics.

StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
In physics, we often use the assumption that if the integral:

\int_D f(\vec x) d \vec x =0

and this holds for any region D in the space, then the integrand must vanish identically everywhere in the space. This was motivated by the argument that if it didn't vanish in some region, we could focus the integrand in that region (say, only where it is positive) and the above equation wouldn't hold. But I was thinking, wouldn't this argument only show that the integrand vanishes almost everywhere. That is, it could still be non-zero on a set of measure zero, and the above equation would still always be satisfied. Is it just that this possibility doesn't concern physicists, or is there actually a way to show it must vanish at every point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, now I see that the argument would work if the function were continuous, because then if there was any point x where f(x) were non-zero, say positive, it would have a neighborhood where f was positive, and so we could integrate over that neighborhood to get a non-zero value. That's good enough for me. You can delete this thread if you want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K