In physics, we often use the assumption that if the integral:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\int_D f(\vec x) d \vec x =0[/tex]

and this holds for any region D in the space, then the integrand must vanish identically everywhere in the space. This was motivated by the argument that if it didn't vanish in some region, we could focus the integrand in that region (say, only where it is positive) and the above equation wouldn't hold. But I was thinking, wouldn't this argument only show that the integrand vanishes almost everywhere. That is, it could still be non-zero on a set of measure zero, and the above equation would still always be satisfied. Is it just that this possibility doesn't concern physicists, or is there actually a way to show it must vanish at every point?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Integrands that vanish everywhere

Loading...

Similar Threads for Integrands vanish everywhere | Date |
---|---|

I Complex integral of a real integrand | May 5, 2017 |

A Is the pole in this integrand integrable? | Apr 12, 2017 |

Puiseux/Taylor Expansion of an Integrand pre-Integration | Feb 1, 2016 |

Substituting for the entire integrand | Jul 7, 2015 |

Calculus derivative of given function vanishes at some point between a and b | Oct 10, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**