Integrating a 2-form on a 2-cube

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of 2-forms over 2-cubes, specifically how it relates to surface integrals in three-dimensional space. The integral of a 2-form, represented as ω = Pdx∧dy + Qdx∧dz + Rdy∧dz, is confirmed to correspond to the flux integral of the vector field F = (P, Q, R) through the 2-cube c([0,1]²). Participants clarify that the integral of a 2-form on a 2-chain in 3-space is indeed the flux integral of the vector field F = (R, -Q, P), emphasizing the need for adjustments in component integration. The conversation also highlights Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds as a foundational text, with Loomis and Sternberg's Advanced Calculus recommended as a complementary resource.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their integration
  • Familiarity with vector fields and flux integrals
  • Knowledge of calculus on manifolds
  • Basic concepts of multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of differential forms in calculus on manifolds
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its applications in vector calculus
  • Explore the relationship between surface integrals and flux integrals
  • Read Loomis and Sternberg's Advanced Calculus for deeper insights into integration on manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced calculus, particularly those studying differential forms and their applications in geometry and physics.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I read, again in Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds, that the integral of 1-form over a 1-cube is equivalent to a line integral. And indeed, if I consider the 1-form w = Pdx + Qdy on R², and c a given 1-cube in R², I find that

\int_c\omega = \int_0^1 F(c(t))\cdot c'(t)dt

where F=(P,Q), which is the integral of the vector field F along the curve c.

Next, I read that the integral of a 2-form over a 2-cube is equivalent to a surface integral. Let \omega = Pdx\wedge dy + Qdx\wedge dz + Rdy\wedge dz be a 2-form onR³ and c be a 2-cube in R³. I am guessing that \int_c\omega corresponds to the flux integral of the vector field F = (P,Q,R) through c([0,1]²). Recall that this integral is given by

\iint_{[0,1]^2}F(c(s,t))\cdot \left(\frac{\partial c}{\partial s}\times \frac{\partial c}{\partial t}\right) dsdt=\iint_{[0,1]^2}P(c(s,t))\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right| - Q(c(s,t))\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right| + R(c(s,t))\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right| \ dsdt

Alright, so I get something close to this, but not quite, so I'm wondering where I'm mistaken... I say,

\int_c\omega = \int_{[0,1]^2}(P\ \circ \ c) c^*(dx\wedge dy)+(Q\ \circ \ c) c^*(dx\wedge dz)+(R\ \circ \ c) c^*(dy\wedge dz)

Now, c^*(dx^i\wedge dx^j)) is a 2-form on [0,1]² so it is of the form f_{ij} \ ds\wedge dt for some 0-form f_ij on [0,1]². In order to find f_ij, let p belong to [0,1]² and v_{p}, \ w_{p} \in \mathbb{R}^2_{p}.

Using the definitions, I find that

c^*(dx^i\wedge dx^j)(v_p,w_p)=dx^i\wedge dx^j(c_*(v_p),c_*(w_p))=dx^i\otimes dx^j(c_*(v_p),c_*(w_p))-dx^i\otimes dx^j(c_*(w_p),c_*(v_p))

where c_*(v_p)=(Dc(p)(v))_{c(p)}, and therefor

dx^i(c_*(v_p))=\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial s}(p)v^1+\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial t}(p)v^2=\left(\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial s}(p)ds+\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial t}(p)dt\right)(v_p)

So I conclude that

c^*(dx^i\wedge dx^j)(v_p,w_p)=\left(\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial s}(p)dx+\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial t}(p)dt\right)\wedge \left(\frac{\partial c^j}{\partial s}(p)dx+\frac{\partial c^j}{\partial t}(p)dt\right)=\left(\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial s}(p)\frac{\partial c^j}{\partial t}(p)-\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial t}(p)\frac{\partial c^j}{\partial s}(p)\right) ds\wedge dt(v_p,w_p)

and hence

f_{ij}=\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial s}\frac{\partial c^j}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial c^i}{\partial t}\frac{\partial c^j}{\partial s}=\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^i}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^j}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^i}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^j}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right|

Finally,

\int_c\omega = \iint_{[0,1]^2}P(c(s,t))\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right| + Q(c(s,t))\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^1}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right| + R(c(s,t))\left| \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial s} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial s} \\<br /> \frac{\partial c^2}{\partial t} &amp; \frac{\partial c^3}{\partial t}<br /> \end{array} \right| \ dsdt

So, 3 things differ: the factors of P and R and the sign of Q.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
Next, I read that the integral of a 2-form over a 2-cube is equivalent to a surface integral. Let \omega = Pdx\wedge dy + Qdx\wedge dz + Rdy\wedge dz be a 2-form onR³ and c be a 2-cube in R³. I am guessing that \int_c\omega corresponds to the flux integral of the vector field F = (P,Q,R) through c([0,1]²). ...

So, 3 things differ: the factors of P and R and the sign of Q.

Thanks!

I'm not seeing any problem here. Modulo any sign errors that I didn't pick up, what you've shown is that the integral of a 2-form on a 2-chain in 3-space \int_c\omega is the flux integral of the vector field F=(R,-Q,P), where P, Q and R are the coordinate components of the 2-form.

Integrating forms on chains is a generalization of curve and surface integration, but it's not necessarily a direct correspondence. Some adjustment of the various components usually has to be performed.

Incidentally, calculus on manifolds is not Spivak's invention. His goal with this book was to provide a short, problem-based introduction to the subject. A great companion book to his is Loomis and Sternberg's Advanced Calculus, which you can get for free here: http://www.math.harvard.edu/~shlomo/.
 
Ok, sweet! And thanks for the book link.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K