Integrating a Multiply Connected Domain Using Cauchy's Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter FanofAFan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 2K views
FanofAFan
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let P(z) = (z-z1)M1(z-z2)M2...(z-zn)Mn
Let [tex]\varsigma[/tex] be a positively directed simple closed curve surrounding all of the zk, k = 1, ... n verify directly that [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\varsigma[/tex] ([tex]\frac{P'(z)}{P(z)}[/tex]dz = 2[tex]\pi[/tex]i(M1+...+Mn)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


did product rule, this is an extension of the Cauchy Gorsat Theorem for multiply connected domains and evaluation of integral of 1/(z-zk) dz where [tex]\varsigma[/tex]k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, ok. It asked you to verify the equation. And if you used the integral of 1/(z-zk) is 2*pi*i then you did it correctly if you got that answer. What's the question? If you don't know how to get that answer then why not? What's P'(z)/P(z)? Use the product rule.
 
First, is the P'(z) = M1(z-z1)M1-1M2(z-z1)M2-1... etc?

Second, is the intergral of 1/(z-zk) just ln(z-zk)? I just not sure how you got 2pi*i?
 
FanofAFan said:
First, is the P'(z) = M1(z-z1)M1-1M2(z-z1)M2-1... etc?

Second, is the intergral of 1/(z-zk) just ln(z-zk)? I just not sure how you got 2pi*i?

No, that's not P'(z). You didn't use the product rule, now did you? Furthermore the integral of 1/(z-zk) around a counterclockwise contour enclosing zk is 2*pi*i. Isn't that Cauchy's integral theorem?
 
Last edited:
P'(z) = M1(z-z1)M1-1(z-z2)M2...(z-zn)Mn +M2(z-z1)M1(z-z2)M2-1...(z-zn)Mn +...+ Mn(z-z1)M1(z-z2)M2...(z-zn)Mn-1
 
FanofAFan said:
P'(z) = M1(z-z1)M1-1(z-z2)M2...(z-zn)Mn +M2(z-z1)M1(z-z2)M2-1...(z-zn)Mn +...+ Mn(z-z1)M1(z-z2)M2...(z-zn)Mn-1

Right! Now divide by P(z). It's a lot harder to write all that out than to say what the answer is.
 
M1(z-z1)M1-1 + M2(z-z2)M2-1 +...+Mn(z-zn)Mn-1

and the integral of that is just (z-z1)M1 + (z-z2)M2 .. etc?
 
FanofAFan said:
M1(z-z1)M1-1 + M2(z-z2)M2-1 +...+Mn(z-zn)Mn-1

and the integral of that is just (z-z1) + (z-z2).. etc?

Wrong! Isn't it M1/(z-z1)+M2/(z-z2)...+Mn/(z-zn)?
 
Dick said:
Wrong! Isn't it M1/(z-z1)+M2/(z-z2)...+Mn/(z-zn)?

wait the integral is M1/(z-z1)+M2/(z-z2)...+Mn/(z-zn)...
 
FanofAFan said:
wait the integral is M1/(z-z1)+M2/(z-z2)...+Mn/(z-zn)...

If you can get behind me and believe that's what P'(z)/P(z) is then yes, that's the integrand. Tell me again why that is what P'(z)/P(z) is.
 
Last edited:
so i got the integral of M1(z-z)M1-1/(z-z1)M1 + ... + etc

which by my attempt in wolfram is M1/(z-z1)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%28x-1%29^%28y-1%29+%2F%28x-1%29^y
 
FanofAFan said:
so i got the integral of M1(z-z)M1-1/(z-z1)M1 + ... + etc

which by my attempt in wolfram is M1/(z-z1)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%28x-1%29^%28y-1%29+%2F%28x-1%29^y

Ok, so you want the integral of M1/(z-z1)+...+Mn/(z-zn) around a contour surrounding all of the zi, right? Integrate it term by term using Cauchy.