Integrating equations of motion with Earth perturbations

In summary, the conversation discusses the development of an n-bodies integrator in MATLAB for determining meteor orbits in an Earth-centric ECI perturbations framework. The main objective is to incorporate the effects of Earth oblateness, specifically the J2 component, on the gravitational potential. The issue being faced is the orbit's orientation changing due to this effect, causing the line of nodes to precess on the equatorial plane. However, this effect is utilized in mapping satellites to maintain a constant lighting angle, eliminating the need for engine adjustments. The cause of this effect is Earth's and Mars' oblateness.
  • #1
morinmau
1
0
Hello to everybody,

i have been programming an n-bodies integrator in MATLAB, in an earth-centric ECI perturbations framework. The main objective is to 'write down' in a procedure an interesting part of phisics, and secondly (at the very end of it) to get a complete integrator for meteor orbits determination from observations.
Given that, i had no problems in getting the right results (i'm testing with ISS) for additional (point mass) bodies and atmospheric drag. The issues I'm facing now regards the modelling of gravitational potential due to Earth oblateness.
Honestly, I'm struggling a bit with the concept of switching from the conventional inertial ECI frame to an ECEF frame, not completely clear to me when this is definitely needed.
I so decided to implement only the zonal component J2: since the J2 effect on gravitational potential depends only on geocentric latitude, the Earth rotation around z-axis should'nt have any effect on the inertial reference frame (skipping precession and nutation).
The problem is the following: when i integrate for few days the satellite position with J2 gravitational effect (whose accellerations are calculated in cartesian coordinates ECI frame, for what said above), the orbit shape is not changed (semimajor axis, eccentricity and inclination don't change) but the orbit's orientation moves anticlockwise. Actually, the line of nodes (longitude of ascending node) precesses on the equatorial plane.
That would be logical if the J2 accellerations would depend on the longitude and we integrate in the ECI coordinates, but it is not.
I checked formulas hundreds times, i used several different formulations of the J2 equations, but no change.
The code is very simply, anyway ...
Am I doing something logically wrong that passed undetected ?
Thanks in advance for any hints you can provide.

Maurizio
 
  • #3
morinmau said:
but the orbit's orientation moves anticlockwise. Actually, the line of nodes (longitude of ascending node) precesses on the equatorial plane.
You are describing a "walking orbit". Many mapping satellites around Earth and Mars (and possibly other worlds) take advantage of this so that they always pass over the daylight side at about local 2pm. It gives them the lighting angle they're after. Without this effect, the satellite would slowly shift, returning to the 2pm longitude one planetary orbit later. To compensate, they would need to fire the engines. But with this effect, its just a matter of choosing the right altitude to get the orbit to precess at about 4 minutes a day (for Earth). This effect is caused by Earth's and Mars' oblateness.
 

1. What are Earth perturbations?

Earth perturbations are small variations or disturbances in the motion of a satellite or spacecraft caused by the gravitational influence of other celestial bodies, such as the Moon and other planets.

2. Why is it important to integrate equations of motion with Earth perturbations?

Integrating equations of motion with Earth perturbations is important in accurately predicting and understanding the orbit of a satellite or spacecraft. Neglecting these perturbations can result in significant errors in the trajectory and can affect the performance of the mission.

3. How do Earth perturbations affect the orbit of a satellite or spacecraft?

Earth perturbations can cause changes in the eccentricity, inclination, and orientation of the orbit of a satellite or spacecraft. They can also lead to changes in the orbital period and can cause the orbit to become unstable over time.

4. What methods are used to integrate equations of motion with Earth perturbations?

There are various numerical methods used to integrate equations of motion with Earth perturbations, including the Runge-Kutta method, the Gauss-Jackson method, and the Cowell's method. These methods use a series of calculations to approximate the orbit of a satellite or spacecraft over a given time period.

5. How do scientists account for uncertainties in Earth perturbations when integrating equations of motion?

Scientists use statistical methods and probabilistic models to account for uncertainties in Earth perturbations when integrating equations of motion. This allows for a more accurate and robust prediction of the satellite or spacecraft's orbit, taking into consideration potential variations in the perturbations.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
86
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
10K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Back
Top