Intellectual level in answering questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights a common issue in educational and technical communication: the tendency for experts to provide overly complex explanations that can confuse beginners. A junior high student seeking to understand the slope of a line received an unnecessarily complicated response, illustrating a disconnect between the questioner's level of understanding and the responder's expertise. An example from a physics Q&A site further emphasizes this point, where a question about the venturi effect was met with a lengthy, technical answer that likely overwhelmed the inquirer. The conversation stresses the importance of tailoring explanations to the audience's knowledge level and encourages questioners to clarify their understanding. It also touches on the tendency of some individuals to showcase their expertise rather than focus on effective communication. Overall, the thread advocates for clearer, more accessible explanations in educational contexts.
Messages
23,771
Reaction score
11,198
A thread in the math forum made me feel the need to address this as it is a real problem not just in this forum, but in life in general. The thread was junior high kid asking about how to find the slope of a line. The explanations went WAAAY over his head. They were far more complicated than they needed to be.

I'm a mechanical engineer designing HVAC systems. I was recently talking to the principal of a school we're working for and 2 minutes into a discussion of their systems she asked: what's a CFM. Oops. Some things are so basic once you know them that you forget if someone hasn't seen it before its not so basic to them.

There is a physics q&a site where I saw a question about the venturi effect and went something like this: If air flowing past a car window pulls a vacuum, why don't the people in the car suffocate? The response (not kidding) was written by a phd candidate and was a good 400 words going into excruciating detail on about the level of a 1st or 2nd year aerospace engineering student. I am SURE whoever wrote the question didn't get 3 sentences into the response. All that was needed was a sentence on gauge vs absolute pressure and a sentence explaining how the venturi effect is only a LITTLE vacuum.

I'm not sure there is much of a discussion in this, but I just felt the need to editorialize. Opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll wonder if I'm the only other one after the principal who doesn't know what CFM or HVAC stands for...
 
D'oh. See, I did it again. Most engineers know both (all should) but only a small portion of the general public should even care: HVAC is Heating, Ventilation, and Air conditioning. CFM is Cubic Feet per Minute (air flow).
 
I guess the point is that we should all gauge our answers to the level of the questioner, huh? And someone asking a question should state what level they are at.
 
unfortunately, some people just take every chance they can get to try to prove themselves to everyone; in doing so they often forget the point of what they are doing.
 
Originally posted by russ_watters
D'oh. See, I did it again. Most engineers know both (all should) but only a small portion of the general public should even care: HVAC is Heating, Ventilation, and Air conditioning. CFM is Cubic Feet per Minute (air flow).
AAhh, I thought you were constructing High VACuum chambers or something like that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
27K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K