Intensity of the background neutron radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the average intensity of background neutron radiation, exploring how it varies based on experimental conditions and environmental factors. Participants discuss the implications of neutron flux in different contexts, including measurement challenges and shielding considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the intensity of background neutron radiation is contingent on the specifics of the experiment being conducted.
  • One participant notes that natural neutron background primarily results from cosmic rays interacting with the atmosphere, with a neutron energy peak around 1 MeV.
  • It is mentioned that neutron production rates can vary based on geomagnetic latitude and solar activity, with higher flux observed at solar minimums and during solar flares.
  • Another participant emphasizes that materials in the experiment interact with cosmic radiation, affecting neutron release and absorption, and that atmospheric shielding plays a role depending on the experiment's elevation.
  • A suggestion is made to consider using high hydrogen content materials for shielding to thermalize neutrons and reduce interference in measurements, particularly for low activity sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how background neutron intensity can vary based on experimental conditions, indicating that there is no consensus on a single value or approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various factors influencing neutron flux, including material interactions, atmospheric shielding, and environmental conditions, which remain unresolved in terms of their specific impacts on measurements.

Garlic
Gold Member
Messages
181
Reaction score
72
Hello everyone,
What is the average intensity of the background neutron radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That will depend on your experiment.
 
mfb said:
That will depend on your experiment.
Sorry, but I don't understand what do you mean by that. Why should the intensity change depending on my experiment?
 
Neutron background
Most of the natural neutron background is a product of cosmic rays interacting with the atmosphere. The neutron energy peaks at around 1 MeV and rapidly drops above. At sea level, the production of neutrons is about 20 neutrons per second per kilogram of material interacting with the cosmic rays (or, about 100-300 neutrons per square meter per second). The flux is dependent on geomagnetic latitude, with a maximum at about 45 degrees. At solar minimums, due to lower solar magnetic field shielding, the flux is about twice as high vs the solar maximum. It also dramatically increases during solar flares. In the vicinity of larger heavier objects, e.g. buildings or ships, the neutron flux measures higher; this is known as "cosmic ray induced neutron signature", or "ship effect" as it was first detected with ships at sea.[11]

Above from Wikipedia
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Garlic
Garlic said:
Sorry, but I don't understand what do you mean by that. Why should the intensity change depending on my experiment?
Every piece of material in your experiment will (a) interact with high-energetic particles passing through (e.g. cosmic radiation) and release neutrons, and (b) absorb some neutrons. In addition, your experiment will have some shielding from the atmosphere above (depends on its height above sea level) and maybe from rock above (for unterground experiment).
And that is just the influence on the raw neutron spectrum, the influence on your measurement devices is more complicated.

How can the background of anything not depend on your experiment?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Garlic
I take it that your question is in regards to your earlier post regarding the measurement of low activity fast neutron sources. Since the energy of the background neutron flux peaks at 1 MeV. and may decrease rapidly above that I would still investigate the possibility of the need of a shield consisting of a high content hydrogen material as polyethylene or paraffin to thermalize those neutrons and reduce their possible interference with your subject radiation. Your source you say is 0.1 Bq so even small background radiation will be of concern in order to achieve data with good accuracy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Garlic
Thank you for your replies, I understand it better. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K