Interesting problem with ideals and function

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Krizalid1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Interesting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the properties of ideals within the context of the ring $A$ and the ring of integers $\mathbb{Z}$. It establishes that the function $f: A \longmapsto A \times \mathbb{Z}$ defined by $f(a) = (a, 0)$ is an injective ring homomorphism. The image of an ideal $J$ under this function, denoted as $J \times \{0\}$, is proven to be an ideal of the ring $A \times \mathbb{Z}$ by verifying the necessary axioms of an ideal, including subgroup properties and absorption conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory, specifically ideals and homomorphisms.
  • Familiarity with Cartesian products of algebraic structures.
  • Knowledge of the properties of the ring of integers, $\mathbb{Z}$.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of ring homomorphisms in greater depth.
  • Study the properties of ideals in various types of rings, including polynomial rings.
  • Investigate the implications of Cartesian products in algebraic structures.
  • Learn about isomorphisms and their role in ring theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone interested in advanced ring theory and the structure of ideals within rings.

Krizalid1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, it's been a while! Here's an interesting problem.

Let $A$ be a ring and $Z$ be the ring of $\mathbb Z.$ Consider the cartesian product $A\times Z.$
Define $A\times Z$ the product $(a,n)\cdot(b,m)=(ma+nb+ab,nm).$
Let $f:A\longmapsto A\times Z$ be defined by $f(a)=(a,0)$ for all $a$ in the ring $A.$ Prove that if $J$ is an ideal of $A,$ its image below the function $f$ is an ideal of the ring $A\times Z.$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
f is clearly an injective ring homomorphism since if f(a) = f(b), (a,0) = (b,0), and by the definition of equality in the cartesian set product, a = b. It is trivial to check that the image of f is A x {0}, which is ring-isomorphic to A.

In other words, the 0 in the 2nd coordinate in Z x A is "just along for the ride", it doesn't contribute any structure to f(A):

(a,0) + (b,0) = (a+b,0+0) = (a+b,0)

(a,0)*(b,0) = (ab,0*0) = (ab,0).
 
Checking the axioms of an ideal:

1. $(J \times \{0\}, +)$ is a sub group of $(A \times \mathbb Z, +)$.
2. $\forall (j,0) \in J \times \{0\}, \forall (r,z) \in A \times \mathbb Z: (j,0) \cdot(r,z) \in J \times \{0\}$.
3. $\forall (j,0) \in J \times \{0\}, \forall (r,z) \in A \times \mathbb Z: (r,z) \cdot(j,0) \in J \times \{0\}$.

These are all trivially true.

Erm... how is it interesting?
 
Last edited:
I've corrected the problem and added things I should've posted before.
Sorry for the inconvenients.
 
Krizalid said:
I've corrected the problem and added things I should've posted before.
Sorry for the inconvenients.

Okay... the subgroup property with respect to + is still trivial.
For right absorption we get:

$$\forall (j,0) \in J \times \{0\}, \forall (a,z) \in J \times \mathbb Z: \\
\qquad (j,0) \cdot (a,z) = (zj+0a+ja, 0z) = (j',0) \in J \times \{0\}$$
This is true, because:
  • $zj$ is a summation of elements in $J$, which is also an element of $J$,
  • $0a=0$,
  • $ja \in J$ because $J$ is an ideal of $A$.

Left absorption is similar.$\qquad \blacksquare$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
985
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
935
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K