Interference with slits of different width

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter weirdoguy
  • Start date Start date
weirdoguy
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
1,399
Hello everyone!

So I'm working through problems from this years' polish physics olimpiad, and I have a problem with one problem (I google-translated it, hope it's not a problem):

A flat wall contains three equidistant, thin slits of identical length. The distance between adjacent slits is d = 2.116 μm. The width of the central slit is w = 1.4 times greater than the other slits. A monochromatic wave with wavelength λ = 650 nm is incident perpendicularly on the partition. Interference fringes can be observed on a screen located at a distance significantly greater than d. Determine the angle at which first interference minimum is observed.

Here is the drawing:

1780491663728.webp


So, authors state that the intensity of wave at the point we are interested in is proportional to:

1780491858605.webp


My question: is there a simple, high-school argument that there should be ##w## in there, multiplying second cosine? I found something on wikipedia, but complex exponents and all that are not a good look in high-school.

I know I should know such things as a physicists, but "waves and oscillations" were at the second year, exactly at the time when I started partying hard, so I'm not that good with waves 👨‍🦽 I'm still good at partying though.


PS. Interesting that google translator changed commas to periods in numbers (we use commas in Poland, so we write 2,116 instead of 2.116).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have learned expansion of
$$\cos(A+B),\cos(A-B),\sin(A+B),\sin(A-B)$$
in high school math.
 
weirdoguy said:
My question: is there a simple, high-school argument that there should be w in there, multiplying second cosine?
Is it not basically treating the three slits as point sources (ok in the Fraunhofer regime), and making the amplitude from the central slit ##w## times higher because it lets through ##w## times more light?
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Ibix said:
making the amplitude from the central slit w times higher because it lets through w times more light?

Ok, I thought about it, but I felt that there is something more to that. Thanks! :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
18K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K