Interior and closure in non-Euclidean topology

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around computing the interior and closure of a specific set within a non-Euclidean topology defined on the real numbers, using a given topological basis. Participants explore how to approach this problem, particularly in contrast to methods used in Euclidean topology.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in computing the interior and closure of the set A, expressing uncertainty about how to apply concepts from Euclidean topology to this non-Euclidean context.
  • Another participant questions the definitions of the inequalities provided, suggesting a clarification on the relationships between a, b, c, and d.
  • A later reply proposes that the problem should be approached in stages, indicating that the relationships between the bounds of the intervals need to be carefully considered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the method to compute the interior and closure in this topology, and there are differing interpretations of the inequalities involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the definitions of the intervals and their relationships, which may affect the computation of the interior and closure.

tomkoolen
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if someone could assist me with the following problem:

Let T be the topology on R generated by the topological basis B:
B = {{0}, (a,b], [c,d)}
a < b </ 0
0 </ c < d

Compute the interior and closure of the set A:
A = (−3, −2] ∪ (−1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) ∪ (2, 3)

I understand that in Euclidean topology I would just include/exclude the boundary points but I don't know how to do this with a different topology, especially since I feel that this topological space is very, very similar to the Euclidean topology, I have shown that all opens in that space are open here as well. What do I do?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomkoolen said:
a < b </ 0
0 </ c < d
Do you mean a < b ≤ 0; 0 ≤ c < d?
 
Yes!
 
The the problem must be dealt with in stages:
  1. a < b < -3; 3 < c < d
  2. a < -3, -3 < b <-2; 3 < c < d
  3. etc. etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K