Interior and closure in non-Euclidean topology

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the interior and closure of the set A = (−3, −2] ∪ (−1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) ∪ (2, 3) within a non-Euclidean topology T generated by the basis B = {{0}, (a,b], [c,d)} where a < b ≤ 0 and 0 ≤ c < d. Participants emphasize the need to adapt traditional Euclidean methods to this non-Euclidean context, particularly in handling boundary points. The conversation highlights the similarities between the two topologies while addressing the unique challenges posed by the specified basis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic topology concepts, including open and closed sets.
  • Familiarity with Euclidean topology and its properties.
  • Knowledge of non-Euclidean topology and how it differs from Euclidean topology.
  • Ability to work with topological bases and generate topologies from them.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of non-Euclidean topologies in detail.
  • Learn how to compute interior and closure in various topological spaces.
  • Explore examples of topological bases and their generated topologies.
  • Investigate the implications of boundary points in non-Euclidean settings.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, topology students, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of topology, particularly those transitioning from Euclidean to non-Euclidean frameworks.

tomkoolen
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if someone could assist me with the following problem:

Let T be the topology on R generated by the topological basis B:
B = {{0}, (a,b], [c,d)}
a < b </ 0
0 </ c < d

Compute the interior and closure of the set A:
A = (−3, −2] ∪ (−1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) ∪ (2, 3)

I understand that in Euclidean topology I would just include/exclude the boundary points but I don't know how to do this with a different topology, especially since I feel that this topological space is very, very similar to the Euclidean topology, I have shown that all opens in that space are open here as well. What do I do?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomkoolen said:
a < b </ 0
0 </ c < d
Do you mean a < b ≤ 0; 0 ≤ c < d?
 
Yes!
 
The the problem must be dealt with in stages:
  1. a < b < -3; 3 < c < d
  2. a < -3, -3 < b <-2; 3 < c < d
  3. etc. etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K