Internal Combustion engine - evolution regarding parasitics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ranger Mike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cam Chain
AI Thread Summary
The evolution of internal combustion engines, particularly the SB2 small block Chevy, involved significant design changes to improve performance and reduce parasitic drag. In the early 1990s, builders increased the cam bore diameter to 60mm for roller bearings, addressing camshaft twisting and optimizing timing in rear cylinders. This shift, along with the introduction of lightweight titanium valves, allowed engines to reach higher RPMs of up to 9000 while reducing valve spring pressures. The weight reduction from transitioning to titanium valves contributed to a notable decrease in reciprocating weight and parasitic drag. These advancements collectively resulted in a power increase of 30 to 50 HP over competitors.
Ranger Mike
Science Advisor
Messages
2,443
Reaction score
427
I wrote this a while back

Mechanical design - cam timing chain versus gear-driven (1 Viewer)​


  • Thread starterpnorm91
  • Start date Sep 12, 2013
Sep 12, 2013

I have since found some new updates. Back in the early 1990s when the SB2 small block chevy engine was coming into play, they engine builders when to a 60mm cam bore diameter so commercially available roller bearings could be used. The reasoning was the camshaft was twisting during operation and timing was not optimum in the rear cylinders. Also the engine had a lot of parasitic drag from very high valve spring loading. About the max you could go was 8000 RPM with current 1990s technology. So they went to roller bearing camshafts and timing belts (see above old post )

Mechanical design - cam timing chain versus gear-driven​


Between these two changes you could pick up 30 to 50 HP over the competition. Later the engine builders went to super light weight titanium valves with 8 mm valve stems ( vs. 11/32" stems). You could up the RPM to 9000 RPM and run lighter valve spring pressures and still go 500 miles.

The weight difference between the old stainless steel 11/32" stem valve and titanium 8mm stem valves add up to reduction of over 1.6 pounds reciprocation and a reduction in contact are (parasitic drag) of .34" diameter reduced to .31 diameter times 16 valves.

Little things add up.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
FYI: you can insert a direct link to any post on PF. The posts you are referring to are:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-chain-versus-gear-driven.710081/post-5153741
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-chain-versus-gear-driven.710081/post-5154901

You can find these URLs by selecting the share icon
share-icon.png
on these posts and then clicking on the copy icon
copy-icon.png
like so:

post-url.png

Then paste the URL in any text you type, like this new post I just wrote for example.

You can also link to the thread entirely by removing the post ID at the end of any of the previous URLs above, like so:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/mechanical-design-cam-timing-chain-versus-gear-driven.710081/
 
living proof you can teach an old dog new tricks! Thank you Jack!
 
  • Like
Likes jack action
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top