Internal police report on handling of 22/7 (ABB) publioshed today

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arildno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Internal Report
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Norwegian police published a report assessing their response to the 22/7 (ABB) crisis, highlighting significant failures in internal alert systems and information relay. Key criticisms include the police's reluctance to involve military personnel during the emergency and operational mistakes, such as police units driving the wrong way and following ineffective protocols. The report has been perceived as a whitewash, failing to hold the police administration accountable for their decisions during the crisis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of emergency response protocols
  • Familiarity with crisis management frameworks
  • Knowledge of military and police collaboration in emergencies
  • Awareness of the 22/7 incident and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of military assistance in civilian emergency responses
  • Examine case studies on effective crisis communication strategies
  • Analyze the impact of protocol adherence on emergency outcomes
  • Investigate the psychological effects of command confusion in crisis situations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for emergency management professionals, law enforcement officials, military strategists, and anyone studying crisis response effectiveness and inter-agency collaboration.

arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
10,165
Reaction score
138
Today, the Norwegian police published its report on what, in their estimation, worked, and did not work, in Norway in the emergency profession on that Black Friday.

A summary has been made in English,
https://www.politi.no/vedlegg/rapport/Vedlegg_1665.pdf

I haven't yet gone through it, but the major points of criticism seems to be that:
a) A collapse of the internal alert systems for such a crisis
b) Inability in the aftermath to provide an organized relay of information.

This basically seems like a whitewash, but is sadly, rather expected.

In particular, the (in my view) culpable reluctance from police quarters to bring in military emergency personnel in such a major crisis seems to be glossed over, since that would target directly the high&mighty within the police ADMINISTRATION level
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arildno said:
Today, the Norwegian police published its report on what, in their estimation, worked, and did not work, in Norway in the emergency profession on that Black Friday.

A summary has been made in English,
https://www.politi.no/vedlegg/rapport/Vedlegg_1665.pdf

I haven't yet gone through it, but the major points of criticism seems to be that:
a) A collapse of the internal alert systems for such a crisis
b) Inability in the aftermath to provide an organized relay of information.

This basically seems like a whitewash, but is sadly, rather expected.

In particular, the (in my view) culpable reluctance from police quarters to bring in military emergency personnel in such a major crisis seems to be glossed over, since that would target directly the high&mighty within the police ADMINISTRATION level
IIRC, a lot of people dropped the ball, or were following ridiculous protocols, just to name a couple of mistakes. Then of course there were Brevik's insane claims that he was some kind of military commander that seemed to confuse the person that took his call.
 
Last edited:
Evo said:
IIRC, a lot of people dropped the ball, or were following ridiculous protocols, just to name a couple of mistakes. Then of course there were Brevik's insane claims that he was some kind of military commander that seemed to confuse the person that took his call.

1. As for the last point, it was proven that the operator just 2 minutes after Breivik's call sent out a general call to the police units that a person had called into surrender (we've heard the internal phone log on that one). So, it seems the operator did what he could on that issue.

2. Another point that was NOT known prior to the police report was that critical moments were lost because several police cars drove the wrong way (they weren't familiar with the terrain).

3. However, most of the damning whitewash as I see it, comes from the refusal of the police in Oslo to call in immediate assistance from the military to secure various strategic points in the capital. Furthermore, it would not have been technically difficult to request a non-police sniper from the military to take an helicopter with "shoot to kill" orders. However such an order would have been politically unprecedented to give, and would probably have reeked of rogue cowboy mentality in the upper echelons of the police administration.

4. Another stupid point of protocol was that the first patrol of local policemen getting to Utvika (the quay on the mainland), had been given orders to OBSERVE (rather than interact/seek to disarm). And, observe they did, and didn't get any other orders..:-(
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K