zoobyshoe
- 6,506
- 1,254
I don't sweat elections much. I vote by party.Ivan Seeking said:What about before something important happens? Do you vote retroactively?
The forum discussion centers on the overwhelming and often unreliable nature of information on the internet. Participants express concerns about the rapid dissemination of news without proper verification, leading to the propagation of sensationalism and misinformation. They highlight the role of human nature in preferring sensational narratives over factual accuracy, and suggest the need for platforms that filter out unreliable content. The conversation also touches on the historical context of sensationalism in media, comparing it to past eras of information dissemination.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for journalists, educators, media analysts, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of information dissemination and the challenges posed by misinformation in the digital age.
I don't sweat elections much. I vote by party.Ivan Seeking said:What about before something important happens? Do you vote retroactively?
phyzguy said:It seems to me that, in addition to the things mentioned here, the internet (and the large number of cable TV stations) is also contributing to the very polarized attitudes we have now, at least in the US. I think that before having access to all of these sites, people would read a few newspapers or watch a few television stations for their news reports. These gave a relatively balanced approach to the news. Now, people seem to only get information from the sites that agree with them, and are only rarely exposed to an alternate viewpoint. In the past, I don't think political opinions were so highly polarized as they are today, and this may be the reason. Does anyone else feel this way?
Glad to hear that. Usually it's pourn that gets intro'd. Poor children, oversexed and underphuqed. Non sequiter you might say, but it is true.Proton Soup said:internet was my intro to Chomsky.
Dawkins has good reason to be angry.don't know Dennett. think Dawkins is little more than an evangelical.