Interpretation: Solution to a set of Linear Equations

Click For Summary
A system of linear equations can yield unique, infinite, or no solutions, which can be interpreted geometrically through the intersection of planes. The relationship between the ranks of augmented and coefficient matrices helps determine the nature of solutions, with equal ranks indicating a fundamental vector space for unique solutions. For infinite solutions, the augmented matrix represents a superset of the fundamental vector space, while dissimilar vector spaces indicate no solutions. Each linear equation corresponds to a set of vectors, with intersections representing the solution set. Understanding these concepts can clarify the underlying structure of linear mappings in vector spaces.
chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
3
Hi,

While solving a system of linear equations, there are three possible cases - unique / infinite / no solutions - to the system.

One geometric interpretation is when one looks at a set of planes intersecting at one / many / no points respectively, for each of the above cases.

While going through what constitutes a vector space & how to check if a set of vectors belongs to a vector space (Sec. 7.4, q 27-36, p.302, Erwin Kreyzsig 9th Ed.), it seemed to me that the tests are similar to the Gauss Elimination method of checking for a single / many / no solutions via the rank of the augmented / coefficient matrices.

Is it possible to interpret the solutions (one, many, none) to a system of linear equations in terms of vector spaces?

I.e. if there is only one solution, the ranks of the augmented & coefficient matrices are equal - this means that we have identified a fundamental vector space for that system of equations.

If there are multiple solutions (infinitely many) to the system, then there is a more fundamental vector space for that system of equations and the augmented matrix / coeffiecient matrix vector space is a super set of that fundamental vector space - thus leading to infinitely many solutions.

For the no solution case, the vector spaces are dissimilar and unrelated, thus no solutions exist.

Apologies if the explanations are unclear - I'm still trying to understand the material better.

TIA for any insights / inputs.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Replace "vector spaces" by "sets of vectors" and it works. Every linear equation corresponds to a set of vectors satisfying this equation. If there is no solution, the intersection is empty. If there is one, the intersection has a single vector.. If there is an infinite set of solutions, you have a line/plane/... in the vector space as set of solutions.
 
Systems of linear equations are linear mappings, which are, in turn, a special class of functions. It is thus isomorphic to a function of n variables in, say, an Euclidean space (which we can visualize easier), and the usual considerations apply. If the system is completely satisfied, you have a point in this space. If you have one variable less than what you'd need, there's a degree of freedom, the variable is free to assume any values, in the same way a line would in an Euclidean space. And so on...
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K