MHB Interval of Concavity for ${x}^{6}\ln\left({x}\right)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter hannahSUU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
hannahSUU
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
\begin{equation} {x}^{6}\ln\left({x}\right)\end{equation}

Find the interval where the function is concave up and down.

The answers I got are:
Concave up: (ln(2), infinity)
Concave down: (0, ln(2))

and for the life of me I cannot figure out why they aren't correct.

any help? (heart)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hannahSUU said:
\begin{equation} {x}^{6}\ln\left({x}\right)\end{equation}

Find the interval where the function is concave up and down.

The answers I got are:
Concave up: (ln(2), infinity)
Concave down: (0, ln(2))

and for the life of me I cannot figure out why they aren't correct.

any help? (heart)

Can you show your working in computing the second derivative?
 
As a follow-up, we are given:

$$f(x)=x^6\ln(x)$$

The first thing I would observe is that the domain of this function is $0<x$.

Using the product rule, we find:

$$f'(x)=\left(6x^5\right)\left(\ln(x)\right)+\left(x^6\right)\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)=x^5\left(6\ln(x)+1\right)$$

Using the product rule again, we find:

$$f''(x)=\left(5x^4\right)\left(6\ln(x)+1\right)+\left(x^5\right)\left(\frac{6}{x}\right)=x^4\left(30\ln(x)+11\right)$$

As $0<x$, we need only look at the critical value that comes from:

$$30\ln(x)+11=0\implies x=e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{30}}}$$

Using test values on either side of this critical value, such as $e^{-1}$ or $e$, we see that we have:

$$30\ln(x)+11<0$$ on $\left(0,e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{30}}}\right)$ and thus $f$ is concave down on this interval.

$$30\ln(x)+11>0$$ on $\left(e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{30}}},\infty\right)$ and thus $f$ is concave up on this interval.

Thus, we have a point of inflection at:

$$\left(e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{30}}},f\left(e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{30}}}\right)\right)=\left(e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{30}}},-\frac{11}{30}e^{\Large{-\frac{11}{5}}}\right)$$

Here is a plot of the given function with the point of inflection shown:

View attachment 7538
 

Attachments

  • concavity_01.png
    concavity_01.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 108
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top