Interviewing for a job with a PhD

  • Context: Job Skills 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RandomGuy88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job Phd
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around expectations for job interviews in industry for candidates with a PhD, particularly regarding the presentation of past work. Participants explore the appropriateness and necessity of presenting PhD work versus proprietary work in interviews.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether presentations about PhD work are expected in future industry job interviews, especially when current work is proprietary.
  • Another participant suggests that the necessity of a presentation depends on the specific position and encourages being upfront about non-disclosure agreements while offering alternative presentation topics.
  • A different participant notes that interviews can vary significantly, and not being able to discuss certain work due to non-disclosure should not negatively impact the interview process.
  • One participant shares their successful interview experiences, emphasizing the importance of tailoring presentations to job requirements and audience interests, and adapting content based on earlier interactions during the interview process.
  • Another participant recounts using their PhD defense presentation in a current job interview, indicating that the focus was more on their ability to communicate rather than the specifics of their previous work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the expectations for presentations in interviews, with some suggesting that it is essential to adapt to the audience while others emphasize the flexibility of topics that can be presented. No consensus is reached on whether a specific type of presentation is universally expected.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the variability of interview expectations based on industry, position, and individual company culture, as well as the impact of non-disclosure agreements on the ability to discuss previous work.

RandomGuy88
Messages
404
Reaction score
6
I have a quick question about what is generally expected during an interview for a position in industry when you have a PhD. When applying for my first industry job out of grad school I gave a presentation about my work as a PhD candidate during the interview. Is this sort of presentation expected for future job interviews? I ask because the work I have done in my first job is proprietary so I cannot give the same type of presentation as I did right out of grad school.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends on the position you're applying for.

If you are in such a situation where you can't disclose the work you've been doing, but have to give a talk, be upfront about that and offer to give a presentation on either your PhD work, or something else you're interested in. Often, the point of such presentations in an interview is to assess your presentation skills.
 
I've known interviews to go in different directions. No one is going to have gas if you can't talk about something you did due to non-disclosures.
 
I have interviewed successfully for several jobs requiring PhD's. In the three successes I tailored my presentation to fit the job requirements.

For example during the on site interview process at Stanford Research Institute (SRI International), I was given a tour of the entire facility where I could question other scientists and engineers. I also had personal interviews with most of the principle researchers where I learned even more about the goals and conduct of the laboratories, how experiments are structured and funded, what data and resources could be shared, etc.

By the time I gave my presentation to the staff I had (mentally) tailored my talk to the needs and requirements of the laboratory. The Q&A following my lecture became a brainstorming session where we modified a computer network I had help design while at NASA to a lower budget series of shared networks suitable to the different research environment. I was able to judge from the earlier interviews the subjects of most interest. When I began work at SRI we essentially implemented the networks outlined in my talk with excellent results.

Not to sound manipulative but professional, by listening closely during numerous interviews I was able to pitch my lecture to the audience level. Parts of the presentation reached the computer science PhD's with appropriate explanations for mathematicians and linguists. I found that clear concise English coupled with clean white board diagrams made for a successful lecture. In a nutshell: adapt to the environment.
 
When I interviewed for my current position,I dug out my PhD defense presentation because I worked proprietary programs throughout my intervening work history, they didn't care, they just wanted to know if I could speak in front of an audience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K