Intrinsic carrier concentration where did I go wrong?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the intrinsic carrier concentration of silicon, given a specific electron density and bandgap. The user initially applies the formula for intrinsic carrier concentration but encounters discrepancies in their results, particularly when considering temperature effects on densities of states. They note that while they can estimate diamond's carrier concentration using silicon's values, it may not be accurate due to differences in material properties. The professor suggests that only the electron concentration and bandgap are necessary for the calculation, leading to confusion about the correct approach. The user seeks clarification on the calculations and the behavior of carrier concentration at absolute zero temperature.
Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I've looked up the intrinsic carrier concentration of silicon, and what I've got isn't close. The question says given there are ##2\times 10^{22}## electrons per cubic cm in silicon, and the bandgap is ##1.1##eV, what is the free electron concentration at room temperature?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My first thought is that since
##n_i = \sqrt{N_cN_v} \exp\left(\frac{-E_g}{2kT}\right)##
Maybe as T tends to infinity all electrons are free electrons so that ##\sqrt{N_cN_v}=n_i##, but then subbing that back in at room temp would mean ##10^{12}## free electrons per cubic cm, so too high, but then that would be assuming the densities of states are constant at different temperatures, and they're not.

For silicon I can get around this by just looking up ##N_c## and ##N_v##, but I have to repeat the process for diamond and the values aren't available. I do get the right order of magnitude estimate for diamond's carrier concentration just by using the same ##N_c## and ##N_v## as for silicon, presumably that's because they're similar in terms of crystal structure.

However, my professor assures me that all I should need is the electron concentration and the bandgap. I'd appreciate any help, been stuck on this for a while! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kara386 said:
Maybe as T tends to infinity all electrons are free electrons so that ##\sqrt{N_cN_v}=n_i##, but then subbing that back in at room temp would mean ##10^{12}## free electrons per cubic cm, so too high, but then that would be assuming the densities of states are constant at different temperatures, and they're not.
How is the situation at T=0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
53K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
24K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K